I cannot think of any wheel concept simpler than this...

[raj]

Oh, I had memorable time dancing with my wife in ballroom in Leicester Square, London, to ABBA’s tune, around the time they won the Eurovision Song Contest. They were three girls and one boy group, a girl lead singer and the young man playing the piano.

During that time, I was working for Barclays Bank International in the Coty as forex clerk.

Raj

[Furcurequs]

Thanks to the internet and youtube, I just listened to their winning performance of "Waterloo" at the 1974 Eurovision Song Contest:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FsVeMz1F5c

I may have first seen them the following year on American Band Stand:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVmKAkIKqPU

PS: That performance certainly didn't help in alleviating any of my teenage angst. That's for sure. ...nor my middle aged angst.

PPS: Oops. In 1975 I wasn't quite yet a teenager, but I definitely still had some angst going on. ...lol

[raj]

Thanks for bringing back good memories.

Sorry for the mistake. Two girls and two boys and it is almost 50 years ago. Have not thought of them since, except heard of their comeback on the news.

Raj

[raj]

GB 1809240.3 : My UK patent pending.

Raj

[Art]

.

I hope Ralph's design doesn't interfere with the patent , that looks like what he has described ! :)

[raj]

Hi Art,
You are a bit late with your statement.

The current drawings relate to my second concept on this thread, my Gravity and Pendulums Powered Wheel concept posted SINCE 15 MAY 2018 on here, without anyone making the slightest remarks, almost ignoring it..

But I am pressing on with this concept, because I believe IT'S a GEM.

Patents are normally granted based on proven prior arts.

If Ralph has some proven prior arts, before mine, then I wish him "GOOD LUCK".

I am on tis forum every single day since December 2009, I have yet to see any drawing posted by Ralph or anybody else, resembling my current concept drawings posted here since 15 MAY 2018.

He who has prior arts can get a patent.

God Bless All!!!

N.B: the semi circular parts in red are not LIQUID. They are Heavy Metal pieces , as BOBS turning the spur gear wheels(4) into PENDULUMS.

I abstain to describe the concept anymore.
Those with keen interest in this concept, can easily understand the concept by following the drawings.

Raj

[raj]

A concept physical model build weeks before patent application.

This build shows clearly that smaller wheel(2) in the drawings will rotate twice as fast as larger wheel(1) and both wheels rotating in the SAME
direction.

This allows me to use the asymmetry of motion of the two wheels, to configure the swinging weights connection, such that there is continuous unidirectional torque on the descending side of wheels.

Raj

[Georg Künstler]

Hi Raj,
again the same question to your new design.
From where do you get the start energy ?

Only when looking at it, I see that the system is in balance.
I compare it with a washing machine.
The washing machine has inside a continues torque, but i will not self running.

So what is producing the imbalance in your new design ?

[raj]

Hello Georg,
There are three specific components in my current concept, namely: A, B, And C.

A === is a main wheel with two spur gear (32 teeth) wheels with heavy metal mass on their lower parts acting as two identical pendulums pivoting on a diametrically opposite spokes of the main wheel.

B=== is small wheel of half the diameter of the main wheel with an inner rim in the form of a spur gear wheel(8 teeth), meshed between the two spur gear wheels on the main wheel, such that both the main wheel and the smaller rotate in the same direction, at an rpm ratio of 2:1.

C===is a configuration of special connection of eight weights(should be heavy), on pairs of strings , one of length of radius of smaller wheel, connected at 90 degrees intervals on outer rim of smaller wheel and one of length of radius of the main wheel, connected at 45 degrees intervals on outer rim of main wheel.

Because of the gearing ratio of 2:1, smaller wheel will rotate in the same direction , twice as fast as the main wheel providing asymmetry of motion, which will have more weights on the descending side, to provide continuous unidirectional torque.

As can be seen from my new drawing, the weights (small green circles), on strings (in blue) connected to rim of smaller wheel B, and on string (in green) connected to outer rim of mail wheel are providing IMBALANCE, and torque for wheel to rotate.

Georg, I took my time to explain, JUST for you.

Raj

[raj]

Can anyone see Newton third Law being broken in the concept drawings above?

Two wheels on a single axle, geared in a VERY special way, rotate in the same direction, one faster than the other, action without reaction, showing asymmetry of motion, in the same direction.

Could this asymmetry of Motion show asymmetry of action and reaction forces?

AS usual, I am not expecting any reply.

Raj

[raj]

Xxxxxxx LOCOMOTIONxxx

Raj

[raj]

Here is a brainteaser for besslerwheelers.

How can you connect two separate wheels on the same axle, such that one wheel rotates faster that the other, rotating in the same direction?

Answers only from those who can.

Many thanks and Bless you .

Raj

[justsomeone]

That's an easy one....

My buzzsaw wheel!

[raj]

Thank you ever so much, Justsomeone.

This is the most useful information I badly needed right now.

Raj

[raj]

Thank you again, Justsomeone, for reminding me of buzzsaw wheel.

I did come across buzzsaw wheel years ago, on this very forum, but I did not give due attention to it.

I just spent the last hour reading the full document online by Preston Stroud, giving full history, descriptions, multiple pictures and videos.

And I am overwhelmed.

Now I can really appreciate how great my own current concept possibilities are.

I am tempted to say I have a winner.

Raj