A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater than 1

A Bessler, gravity, free-energy free-for-all. Registered users can upload files, conduct polls, and more...

Moderator: scott

Post Reply
User avatar
WaltzCee
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3361
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:52 pm
Location: Huntsville, TX
Contact:

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by WaltzCee »

and my question for you, Mr Dickweed, is when are you going to let
this turd of a thread flush?

Image

Pull the handle. You can do it.
........................¯\_(ツ)_/¯
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ the future is here ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Advocate of God Almighty, maker of heaven and earth and redeemer of my soul.
Walter Clarkson
© 2023 Walter W. Clarkson, LLC
All rights reserved. Do not even quote me w/o my expressed written consent.
User avatar
Tarsier79
Addict
Addict
Posts: 5099
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:17 am
Location: Qld, Australia

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by Tarsier79 »

Do you remember our correspondence of Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:11 pm illustrating your pathological ignorance and haterness?

No, I remember George1 being an arrogant A-hole. I remember you asking for $1,000,000 for a kettle. Then I remember lots of red dots, then you lied and pretended to be Peter. Neither is your real name, but we can tell you are both because Peter is an arrogant A-hole as well. Then there were some facts which you ignored because you are unable to refute them. Then there were all those pages nobody cared, and they still don't. Then I remember you couldn't provide any evidence or mechanism to support your hypothesis. Then, much like all of your academic assessments, there was lots of copy>paste. It was of someone elses work, so you didn't understand it anyway. Then there was that thing about your superior team of international experts that also don't exist. I also remember you having a superiority complex and belittling everyone and anyone that interacts on your threads.

So I said something hatefull on March 16? It should have been more.

It is not lack of intelligence or understanding of others that stops them from participating in your thread.
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

To Tarsier79 and to WaltzCee.
--------------------------------------
You both are simply two stubborn and ignorant haters. You both have serious cognitive problems. Stop beat about the bush! Stop talking nonsense! Answer my question below!
---------------------------------------
Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution is given below.
Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution consists of two lines only.
LINE 1. Current through the electrolyte is given by I = (m)/(Z x t).
LINE 2. Power consumed = (I) x (I) x (R) = ((m)/(Z x t)) x ((m)/(Z x t)) x (R) = 31.86 W.
=======================
I am asking you my question for the 9th time: Is Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution correct? Yes or no? Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
----------------------------------------
I am waiting for your answer for the 9th time. Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
User avatar
MrTim
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 922
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 11:05 pm
Location: "Excellent!" Besslerwheel.com's C. Montgomery Burns
Contact:

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by MrTim »

PeterAX,
Your horse (device) will not run, no matter how much you beat it. Image
All we see from you is fertilizer*...




* Others may wish to substitute a stronger, more accurate, word... ;-)
"....the mechanism is so simple that even a wheel may be too small to contain it...."
"Sometimes the harder you look the better it hides." - Dilbert's garbageman
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

To MrTim.
----------------------------
Hi there,
Hi dear colleague:),
I was so sad because of your absence and I am extremely glad now that you are writing to me again!:) Let us push forward together the technology progress!:)
Regards,
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

COP > 1 for any standard water-splitting electrolysis process. Looking forward to your comments.
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

Hi there,
Any fresh ideas?:)
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

Still no comments? Deep silence again?:)
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

Still waiting for your comments.:)
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

Still no comments?:)
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

Looking forward to your comments.
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

COP > 1 for any standard water-splitting electrolysis process. Simple, clear and understandable. And obvious.
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

COP > 1 for any standard water-splitting electrolysis process. A simple and obvious fact.
User avatar
MrTim
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 922
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 11:05 pm
Location: "Excellent!" Besslerwheel.com's C. Montgomery Burns
Contact:

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by MrTim »

Emperor PeterAX, you keep trying to convince us how beautiful your clothes are, but as we've told you countless times, you aren't wearing any! At least put on some clean underpants, if only for the children...
"....the mechanism is so simple that even a wheel may be too small to contain it...."
"Sometimes the harder you look the better it hides." - Dilbert's garbageman
User avatar
Wubbly
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 727
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:15 am
Location: A small corner of the Milky Way Galaxy
Contact:

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by Wubbly »

Attachments
WTB?
WTB?
Post Reply