Darrell Vandusen Poll

Miscellaneous news and views...

Moderator: scott

Post Reply

Darrell Vandusen should be:

You may select 1 option

18
60%
6
20%
6
20%
 
Total votes: 30
 

User avatar
jim_mich
Addict
Addict
Posts: 7467
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Michigan
Contact:

re: Darrell Vandusen Poll

Post by jim_mich »

winkle wrote:....just what do you have to do to get kicked off this site ?
Saying you have a working wheel and taking other peoples time and money, when in fact all you have is an idea or a proto type that doesn't work. This is called fraud. It is dishonest. You will get a bad reputation. A really bad reputation will get you kicked off the board.

Image
User avatar
ken_behrendt
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3487
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 7:45 am
Location: new jersey, usa
Contact:

re: Darrell Vandusen Poll

Post by ken_behrendt »

It's interesting to note that, so far, of the 28 members who voted in this poll, 10 or about 35.7% (over a third) either don't care if he stays or want him to stay. So, apparently, the condemantion of Darrell is not universal on this Discussion Board.

Yes, claiming one has a working wheel when one does not is a bad thing to do. Collecting money from those who believe in one's design is even worse.

I think in a lot of cases like this, however, the inventor does not really start out to commit fraud, but, rather, is so enthusiastic about his yet to be completed or fully tested design, that he is swept along by the euphoria of it all. In this state of impaired judgement, he makes all sorts of claims and promises. Eventually, he realizes that he was wrong, but, then, can not find the courage to admit his error and make amends to anybody that he may have harmed financially.

Anyway, I am not completely familiar with the Vandusen incident but, I wonder, would it be possible for him to be unbanned if he was to admit his error and then financially compensate anybody who was swept up in the matter?


ken
On 7/6/06, I found, in any overbalanced gravity wheel with rotation rate, ω, axle to CG distance d, and CG dip angle φ, the average vertical velocity of its drive weights is downward and given by:

Vaver = -2(√2)πdωcosφ
User avatar
Jonathan
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2453
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 6:29 am
Location: Tucson, Az

re: Darrell Vandusen Poll

Post by Jonathan »

No. I am very familiar with his case, and there's no doubt that fraudulence was his intent from the outset. We stand to gain nothing from readmitting him, he has nothing to bring to the table.
Disclaimer: I reserve the right not to know what I'm talking about and not to mention this possibility in my posts. This disclaimer also applies to sentences I claim are quotes from anybody, including me.
ovyyus
Addict
Addict
Posts: 6545
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:41 am

re: Darrell Vandusen Poll

Post by ovyyus »

Ken, your comments show no regard for those who were ripped off by this parasite. I suggest that you contact Vandusen privately - his contact email is easy to find - and embark on your own personal journey of discovery with him. I'm sure he'd be happy to hear from you!

When he's done with you, or you with him, you'll have something more substantial to offer than easy armchair opinions and/or excuses on his behalf.
winkle
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1059
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 11:27 pm
Location: Texas

re: Darrell Vandusen Poll

Post by winkle »

am i wrong or do all scams require the sucker to be greedy...eny thing else is called charity....is it the scamers place to keep me from being so greedy i scam my self...it's a tuff world out there.....there be scammers in them there hills....enron,world com,bush,darrel...if you are going to hand over you're hard earned money before seeing something that works mabe it be better to grab you're butt with both hands and run screaming down the road...........enron got me for a few bucks....but now that i think about it they got kicked off
Last edited by winkle on Sat Oct 08, 2005 11:10 pm, edited 2 times in total.
the uneducated

if your gona be dumb you gota be tough

Who need drugs when you can have fatigue toxins and caffeine
ovyyus
Addict
Addict
Posts: 6545
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:41 am

re: Darrell Vandusen Poll

Post by ovyyus »

You're wrong. As you probably already know winkle, some people see no harm in lying to get what they want for free. Parasites don't care whether they sucker someone who is charitable or greedy, as long as they get what they want.

What's you point - looking for a loophole?
User avatar
jim_mich
Addict
Addict
Posts: 7467
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Michigan
Contact:

re: Darrell Vandusen Poll

Post by jim_mich »

No winkle, most scams require the sucker to be trusting and helpful. It is the perpetrator that is greedy, deceitful and dishonest.

Image
winkle
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1059
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 11:27 pm
Location: Texas

re: Darrell Vandusen Poll

Post by winkle »

like i said trying to get in on a sweetheart deal cheep might be greedy...could make you hurt you're self.......just talking about the real world not some fable where everyone is sweet and kind....i guess that sweet and kind part don't seem to apply to you ovyyous.....i don't need a loop hole i know what it cost to make one.....i'll say this also does not take $10.000 to make......if eny body say more than a few hunderd it would be time to cover you'r butt and hit the road screaming........i have ask no one on this board for enything other than some advise....i won't be asking for enything more expensive than that
the uneducated

if your gona be dumb you gota be tough

Who need drugs when you can have fatigue toxins and caffeine
ovyyus
Addict
Addict
Posts: 6545
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:41 am

re: Darrell Vandusen Poll

Post by ovyyus »

Scams and lies, whether it be to steal your money or your time, certainly don't surprise me anymore. But I'm completely baffled by how many different ways there are to spell my handle - lol

PS winkle, I notice you heavily edited the post that Jim and I responded too - now it looks much less like an effort to find loopholes and place blame on the poor sucker ;)
Last edited by ovyyus on Sat Oct 08, 2005 11:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jonathan
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2453
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 6:29 am
Location: Tucson, Az

re: Darrell Vandusen Poll

Post by Jonathan »

I agree with sladikefovyyjosadigomus.
Disclaimer: I reserve the right not to know what I'm talking about and not to mention this possibility in my posts. This disclaimer also applies to sentences I claim are quotes from anybody, including me.
ovyyus
Addict
Addict
Posts: 6545
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:41 am

re: Darrell Vandusen Poll

Post by ovyyus »

LOL - thanks JoneothianeousfrinkumdinkumMmmglavin!
winkle
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1059
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 11:27 pm
Location: Texas

re: Darrell Vandusen Poll

Post by winkle »

you use the word sucker like it's a good thing....is it better to be a sucker or a scammer?.....i don't find much of a defence for either one......just answer this question ....which would you rather be a sucker or scammer.....as to you're handle i can't find it in the Dictionary so i ain't sure how to spell it....can you spell this (i know how the wheel works and you don't):p
Last edited by winkle on Sun Oct 09, 2005 2:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
the uneducated

if your gona be dumb you gota be tough

Who need drugs when you can have fatigue toxins and caffeine
ovyyus
Addict
Addict
Posts: 6545
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:41 am

re: Darrell Vandusen Poll

Post by ovyyus »

I'd rather be a sucker than a scammer any day! It doesn't surprise me at all that you don't know the difference, winkle.

You're guessing about what I know like you're guessing that you have a solution :P
winkle
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1059
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 11:27 pm
Location: Texas

re: Darrell Vandusen Poll

Post by winkle »

if there were no suckers "there could be no scammers"......are you sure you would rather be a sucker if so you would create another scammer......you know being dumb and being a nice person are not the same thing.....the second is by choice the first may or may not be......if choosing to be dumb thats worse than being natural born dumb .....seems like a 50-50 problem to me.....but as always if someone looses some money it's always the other persons fault never their own....seems like stamping out suckers will put an end to scammers....they will just fade away.....oh i almost forgot we have to do away with greed before we can do away with suckers.............................as to the other you are half right....i would be guessing about you.....fairly safe guess though....................i will tell you this though....after you find the answer to the first way your mind turns quickly to just how many different ways are there to make these things
Last edited by winkle on Sun Oct 09, 2005 3:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
the uneducated

if your gona be dumb you gota be tough

Who need drugs when you can have fatigue toxins and caffeine
ovyyus
Addict
Addict
Posts: 6545
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:41 am

re: Darrell Vandusen Poll

Post by ovyyus »

Winkle, I have to wonder why you're defending scammers - actually, no I don't.
Post Reply