Inertial induction!?...

A Bessler, gravity, free-energy free-for-all. Registered users can upload files, conduct polls, and more...

Moderator: scott

iacob alex
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2413
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:37 am
Location: costa mesa /CA/US
Contact:

re: Inertial induction!?...

Post by iacob alex »

.....an interesting experiment , at :
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ek8keardyGs
Some people intend to play inertial propulsion with this asymmetric couple of "merry go round"...some people's opinion of this forum is related to a possible gravity (self) powered device...
Al_ex
Simplicity is the first step to knowledge.
iacob alex
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2413
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:37 am
Location: costa mesa /CA/US
Contact:

re: Inertial induction!?...

Post by iacob alex »

.....this time , a tractive centrifugal pulsatory vector was a proposal at :
www.oocities.org/iacob_alex/An_essay.html
...starting with a well known image , at :
www.powerquip.co.kr/images/Products/feature/gear2.gif
...so to develop a new kind of propulsion.
Al_ex
Simplicity is the first step to knowledge.
User avatar
Silvertiger
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1059
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:12 pm
Location: Henderson, KY

Post by Silvertiger »

Not to state the obvious, but nothing can be accomplished by sitting in a rocking chair all day expecting a parked car to move by itself. Inertia is simply the resistance a mass gives to any change in motion from its relative state of rest. If you want to get more into the ball field here, talk about momentum. Inertia cannot be "induced," since it is already there by default, and hence neither can a motion be induced by inertia. Momentum, however, is inertia IN motion, or "quantity of motion" if you will, which is the propensity a mass has to resist any change in motion once it is already IN motion. The "quantity" is based on how much mass is moving and at what velocity. Consequently, and in no special leaps or bounds, momentum is the product of mass and velocity. P=mv. This is how things like Newton's cradle and the recoil of a gun work, just to name a couple, which operate on something known as "transfer of momentum." Example: a 3,280 lb Ford Fusion has far less quantity of motion than an 80,000 lb semi moving at the same velocity, meaning that if they collided head-on, one could easily surmise, without any special calculations, which vehicle would keep going and which one wouldn't have a prayer. Like the proverbial fly on a windshield... And since momentum is a product of mass and velocity, it is, technically, "induced" by the motion itself. So even if you tried to magically use momentum to propel an engine, it would never move. However, there's probably more promise if you think about the "induction" idea, instead, in terms of the induction of motion via transfer of momentum. This would be Alex's ideal mechanical equivalent of a capacitor.
iacob alex
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2413
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:37 am
Location: costa mesa /CA/US
Contact:

re: Inertial induction!?...

Post by iacob alex »

Hi !
It is a problem how we understand the rotational "effects" : http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifuge and their new possible applications , especially ("high gravity" or very high accelerations ).
Simply , we can apply "action=reaction" , related to inertia.
If we know to obtain huge accelerations , as a spinning "effect" , can we call this "arousing " as a kind of inertial "induction"!?...or a "motional induction" ?!
Now...if we achieve to control ("harness"...) this excelent two-way tractive vector into an one-way one !?
Al_ex
Simplicity is the first step to knowledge.
User avatar
Silvertiger
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1059
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:12 pm
Location: Henderson, KY

re: Inertial induction!?...

Post by Silvertiger »

Once again, inertia is the motion-resistant property of objects at REST, meaning that they're not moving...at all. Inertia comes from the word "inert," meaning "lacking the ability or strength to move." Thus, action and reaction are rendered moot in the case of inertia because without action there IS no reaction. Unless a net force acts to set the object at rest INTO motion, action/reaction does not apply. It is void. No motion, no action, no reaction, no induction... -_-
Philosophy is the beginning of science; not the conclusion.
iacob alex
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2413
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:37 am
Location: costa mesa /CA/US
Contact:

re: Inertial induction!?...

Post by iacob alex »

Hi Silvertiger !
Some people understand and imagine the rotational / inertial effects as :
www.icr-science.org/index.htm
Maybe , it's a strange vision if you try to see the possible/impossible things , but ..."whatever you cannot understand , you cannot possess"/JWGoethe
Al_ex
Simplicity is the first step to knowledge.
User avatar
AB Hammer
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3728
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:46 am
Location: La.
Contact:

Post by AB Hammer »

Al_ex

That video is computer animated on those rides. I stopped watching for it was hard to watch.
iacob alex
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2413
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:37 am
Location: costa mesa /CA/US
Contact:

re: Inertial induction!?...

Post by iacob alex »

Hi ABHammer !

The animation and the fantastical extension of a basic theme of this movie is so evident...but the end of wisdom is to fancy high enough and to lose the path to reality.

Our problem can be the difference between knowing and understanding a lot of things regarding rotational inertia...this "centrum fugere" or a manner to flee,fly,evade ...as a new kind of driving forward (propulsion ).

If we possess great centrifugal ("flying") accelerations , we need a simple mechanical device...as the gas pedal of an automobile.

Here , again : "Whatever you cannot understand , you cannot possess " / Goethe
Al_ex
Simplicity is the first step to knowledge.
User avatar
Silvertiger
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1059
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:12 pm
Location: Henderson, KY

Post by Silvertiger »

Hmm, let me see if I can try this yet another way... Alex, in order for any action to be induced, there must first exist a potential energy in order to do that. Inertia is a property which has no potential energy to give, simply because it is not a force; it is not a vector, nor is it a scalar. It is merely a measure of the value of resistance an object has to moving itself and/or being moved by a net force, hence the more mass the object in question has, the greater its inertia - its resistance to being moved - will be. In the case of a rotating body about a fixed axis, this is known as moment of inertia, and it is proportional to the amount of torque required to overcome it and cause an angular acceleration of the mass to occur. Since it is not a vector, moving objects have inertia, since in relative terms unto itself can still be described as being at rest. Momentum is inertia's vector counterpart, where velocity becomes a player. Can you be specific about it and describe just HOW inertia can induce a motion?
iacob alex
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2413
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:37 am
Location: costa mesa /CA/US
Contact:

re: Inertial induction!?...

Post by iacob alex »

Hi !
A little experience often upsets a lot of theory : many things difficult to comprehend prove easy to perform.
My proposal was to develop a two-way vector ( a pile driver with a contra-rotating eccentric masses ) into an one-way vector ( for a possible new kind of propulsion ) , nothing more.
For the present moment , the theory of inertia ( basic law of mechanics...) , is as in a "Cloud chamber".
Anyway , we have a certain perception about the answer of inertia :
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/inertial%force
...if we intend to speak the same "language".
If our action is a high acceleration ("high gravity"...) , as :
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultracentrifuge
...we can play the opposite reaction of the "centrifugal-centripetal" pair , as an one-way tractive vector , focusing it in the pivot/support point.
Any theory must be tempered , step by step , with reality .
Al_ex
Simplicity is the first step to knowledge.
iacob alex
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2413
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:37 am
Location: costa mesa /CA/US
Contact:

re: Inertial induction!?...

Post by iacob alex »

.....can it be a reason to think about the inertial propulsion as a possible new manner to understand to first law of mechanics ?! ...if we take a look at :
www.inertialpropulsion.com/dean_drive.htm
If a Buehler drive mechanical oscillator converts 360* rotary motion into a powerfull 180* bi-directional force , the next step can be an AC/DC problem , so to obtain an unidirectional tractive motion of an object...
Al_ex
Simplicity is the first step to knowledge.
iacob alex
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2413
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:37 am
Location: costa mesa /CA/US
Contact:

re: Inertial induction!?...

Post by iacob alex »

.....if we use a gravity potential "discharge" into a rotational process , so to stimulate an inertial induction ...something resembling at :
https://blog.craneengineering.net/how-t ... pump-curve

It's like playing "vis-viva" via an inertial/rotational "muscle" with a variable throwing arm...
The so "old" trebuchet plays , also ...the gravity free fall power into a half-turn variable centrifugal inertia...let's call this an inertial induction?!

Al_ex
Simplicity is the first step to knowledge.
iacob alex
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2413
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:37 am
Location: costa mesa /CA/US
Contact:

re: Inertial induction!?...

Post by iacob alex »

Hi !
A lot of proposals , starting with a common " copy " image ( bird's flapping the air...and inertia) , at :
https://www.oocities.org/iacob_alex/Ine ... otors.html
...playing inertia ( planar/2D variable rotational velocity ) with a variable speed motor.
To obtain a "clean" tractive vector , we must synchro pair them.
Inertial induction is in fact...acceleration induction.
If we have acceleration...you know !
Al_ex
Simplicity is the first step to knowledge.
Post Reply