3x Effic. Engine

[Oxygon]

http://www.bendbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.d ... /705220334

The above link is to the 3x efficient engine.

My post relates to the design if the motor...

I think I understand it...

Is it a souped up version of this?

http://www.etool.ca/eTool/RENDER/1/26/255/3329.html

[rlortie]

The push pull screwdriver/drill is better known as a 'Yankee" and was very popular before cordless screwdrivers won the market. I have owned four of them and a friend is giving me one still in the original box. It is getting hard to find replacement bits for these tools of yesteryear!

Some may also remember the "level wind" bait casting fishing reel that worked on the same principle.

I am a little apprehensive of a combustion engine using this design. I cannot see as to how it could deliver the torque available in a long stroke in-line combustion engine.

Ever ask yourself why an in-line six cylinder engine can deliver more low end torque than a V-8 with 50% more cubic inches.

Ralph

[mickegg]

If the piston is rotating in the cylinder it plays havoc with the piston rings.

This has been a problem of other designs that required this to happen.

I'm particularly thinking of the rotary "v" engine.


Mick

[rlortie]

I just imported this from JLN Labs posted by Butch Lafonte

Check out these video's
This could be the real deal.
Butch

http://www.wpbf.com/news/13383827/detail.html

http://www.wkyc.com/video/player.aspx?aid=35660&bw=

Ralph

[graham]

Hi Ralph that's very interesting, but it's not something for nothing.
The question is: how much energy is required to generate the radio waves that pass through the salt water?

Graham

[DrWhat]

Graham, you beat me to it!

Now if you could perpetuate the flame when the radio waves are removed, now THAT would be something (but perhaps impossible?).

I guess you need the flame to run a generator that creates the radio-waves that create the flame and so on in a cycle.

A lot of this stuff is on www.overunity.com

Have a look at my post on getting water from air. Simple science, not fantasy! And Australian which is even better!

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2446

[docfeelsgood]

Ralph ; I went to your link of John Kanzius research . I believe his reaearch is admirable but i fail to see how he can claim it as totally his own . please refer to my thread this forum "a cure for cancer" ! This technology was pioneered by Doctor Royal Ramond Rife back in the 1920s and 30s . he is researchable on the net and was reported to be making remarkable strides in this field untill gov. supression stopped him .

[rlortie]

Doc,

I agee with you about Rife!

Back then when Tesla and the advent of the Marconi Radio, which lead to the five-tube multi-band super heterodyne, there was a lot of people pushing High frequency and high voltage for medicinal purposes.

I recall articles about making and breathing Ozone as a cure for cancer and other health problems. When it was found that ozone was not good for you a lot of this type research and sales pitches dried up.

Ralph