Why haven't we yet seen a real working perpetual SMOT?

A Bessler, gravity, free-energy free-for-all. Registered users can upload files, conduct polls, and more...

Moderator: scott

Post Reply
psychopath
Dabbler
Dabbler
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 10:50 am

Why haven't we yet seen a real working perpetual SMOT?

Post by psychopath »

This is my first post, so...yeah...

At first I thought the reason why the SMOT didn't work was because the ball couldn't pass the final magnet. Then I realised that this problem has been solved, and I have seen videos of the ball dropping after gaining about 1 cm in height.

So now what is the problem? The sticky spot has been solved, simply by dropping the ball through gravity. Shouldn't the rest be easy? Since the only sticky spot is solved?
ovyyus
Addict
Addict
Posts: 6545
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:41 am

re: Why haven't we yet seen a real working perpetual SMOT?

Post by ovyyus »

Dropping the ball off the end of the ramp is easily achieved when the ball is allowed to drop to a position that is lower than the ramp entry level. Therein lies the whole of the problem.
psychopath
Dabbler
Dabbler
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 10:50 am

re: Why haven't we yet seen a real working perpetual SMOT?

Post by psychopath »

ovyyus wrote: Dropping the ball off the end of the ramp is easily achieved when the ball is allowed to drop to a position that is lower than the ramp entry level.
Could you elaborate on that? Why does the ball need to be dropped to a position that is lower than the entry level?
User avatar
Jon J Hutton
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 922
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Somewhere

re: Why haven't we yet seen a real working perpetual SMOT?

Post by Jon J Hutton »

Psy,

I really have no idea, it seems that its a done deal by looking at all the smot videos from u-tube....but the camera can be decieving by someone looking for their moment of fame. Perhaps this wm attachment might work....who knows.

JJH
Attachments
smot wheel 2.wm2d
(20.73 KiB) Downloaded 339 times
User avatar
wheelmaster
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:52 am
Location: Augusta,Ga

re: Why haven't we yet seen a real working perpetual SMOT?

Post by wheelmaster »

I have built many smots and have used them as science projects for my children. The drop position does not need to be lower than the start position.

Build one yourself and see what I mean. All the parts can be found at Lows. Take about 10 minutes to put together.
"I then reminded him to harness the horse in front."
- Johann Bessler
ovyyus
Addict
Addict
Posts: 6545
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:41 am

re: Why haven't we yet seen a real working perpetual SMOT?

Post by ovyyus »

wheelmaster wrote:The drop position does not need to be lower than the start position.
Kids one-shot demos are fine, but if you're trying to build a forever looping SMOT then the final drop position is always equal to the ramp entry height.

That's why the basic SMOT experiment is so deceiving: the ball rolls up the ramp and drops off the end with what seems like enough momentum to make it back to the ramp entry again. It seems so intuitive. But the ramp exit drag back force robs all the gained energy of the balls ascent and, with losses taken into account, the loop won't close.

That's not to say that a well made SMOT with minimal losses and a little bit of extra initiating kick might not be able to make a few circuits before losses eventually bring it to a halt. But no one has demonstrated a forever looping SMOT and for good reason too - the device would have to gain energy from somewhere in order to keep going. It has no facility to gain any additional energy from it's magnets or from Gravity. It's dead.

If I wanted to demonstrate a forever looping SMOT then I would carefully position the ramp so that the ball was exposed to a very slight tail breeze as it was pulled up the ramp to its drop off point. This would result in just enough energy gained from the very slight breeze to overcome the minute losses of the system and it would continue for as long as the imperceptable input was applied. It would make a great video - but it would be cheating :)
User avatar
Bessler007
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 418
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:19 am

re: Why haven't we yet seen a real working perpetual SMOT?

Post by Bessler007 »

Your cheatin' SMOT will make you weep
You'll cry and cry and try to sleep
But slee-eep won't come the whole night through
Your cheatin' SMOT will tell on you
User avatar
wheelmaster
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:52 am
Location: Augusta,Ga

re: Why haven't we yet seen a real working perpetual SMOT?

Post by wheelmaster »

Being that my shop is the great outdoors and the current temp here is over 100 degrees. I cannot work on my current wheel project.

I`ll invest some time into building a SMOT this weekend. All it takes are some magnets and some duck tape. God bless the inventer of duck tape because its a wonderful thing.

By the way ovyyous, have you ever put together a SMOT?
"I then reminded him to harness the horse in front."
- Johann Bessler
User avatar
wheelmaster
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:52 am
Location: Augusta,Ga

re: Why haven't we yet seen a real working perpetual SMOT?

Post by wheelmaster »

psychopath

Try this this site http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=1735.0

It is a discussion on how to close the loop.
"I then reminded him to harness the horse in front."
- Johann Bessler
ovyyus
Addict
Addict
Posts: 6545
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:41 am

re: Why haven't we yet seen a real working perpetual SMOT?

Post by ovyyus »

wheelmister wrote:By the way ovyyous, have you ever put together a SMOT?
Well yes of course, otherwise I'd surely be talking out my arse :D
User avatar
Fletcher
Addict
Addict
Posts: 8455
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 9:03 am
Location: NZ

re: Why haven't we yet seen a real working perpetual SMOT?

Post by Fletcher »

Blessed are the lips that speak without moving ;)
psychopath
Dabbler
Dabbler
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 10:50 am

re: Why haven't we yet seen a real working perpetual SMOT?

Post by psychopath »

Ok, attacthed here is an oversimplified drawing of a circular SMOT with a return ramp(forgive me, I can't draw!).

I saw a similar drawing before, and people have probably even tried it.

But what is wrong with it? Never have I seen someone actually disprove it. Sorry, but "thermodynamics" is not an answer. Tell me exactly where it reaches equilibrium and exactly where the ball stops.

If it cannot be disproved, then, to me, all it is is an engineering problem, not a science one.

edit: I am having trouble attatching the image, but the description should be enough.
User avatar
wheelmaster
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:52 am
Location: Augusta,Ga

re: Why haven't we yet seen a real working perpetual SMOT?

Post by wheelmaster »

Ovyyus,
Kids one-shot demos are fine, but if you're trying to build a forever looping SMOT then the final drop position is always equal to the ramp entry heigh
t

You are correct. I have tried over and over again to complete the loop with no success to date. There is a way to skin this cat but it just has not been found.

psychopath.

Don`t give up on it. Remember a loadstone ( rare earth magnet) was found in JB`s home.
"I then reminded him to harness the horse in front."
- Johann Bessler
Post Reply