kinetic energy hypothesis

A Bessler, gravity, free-energy free-for-all. Registered users can upload files, conduct polls, and more...

Moderator: scott

Post Reply
User avatar
preoccupied
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1990
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:28 am
Location: Michigan
Contact:

kinetic energy hypothesis

Post by preoccupied »

Hi All,

I believe kinetic energy shifts towards the center of a flywheel when it spins faster. The experiment I propose wants a flywheel to spin near its breaking point and then a gun to shoot near the axle. The hypothesis is that the structure near the axle will be greater than the normal structural resistance of the material because the kinetic energy would be concentrated near the axle.

My MS painting explains further about why I think kinetic energy shifts the way that it does. I introduced a concept for a peacocks tail in Jim_Mich thread Mechanical configurations. In the MS painting the MDA (Mechanical disadvantage) goes to the weights further from the axle making them easier to push on by the driving weights using my formula that I invented.

Shifting of kinetic energy also supports my hypothesis for motion in which I believe kinetic energy is also structure and structure is also motion, where structure has to be changed to stop motion because they are the same thing. Therefore a perfectly shattering material can stop an automobile without causing any whiplash because all of the motion would be captured by the change in structure because structure and motion are the same thing.

This is also why I believe that if I can artificially give something greater kinetic energy by mechanical means that I can possibly give a human being super strength or an object greater structural resistance than it would normally have, such as I hypothesize a flywheel does towards its axle. This supports my other idea where I believe arches can make a perfect shield with the best possible resistance and leverage from breaking, by weaving the arches together such that a skin comprises of only the key stones. That could then be used to make a super efficient micro shield that nearly perfectly shatters in layers to prevent all car crash casualties, as I had described in Jim_Mich thread Mechanical configurations.

Sincerely,
Preoccupied
Attachments
sp1k1 divided by sp2k2.jpg
User avatar
AB Hammer
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3728
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:46 am
Location: La.
Contact:

re: kinetic energy hypothesis

Post by AB Hammer »

kinetic energy helps keep everything in motion and as I see you are working more towards a CF effect which is a good direction. BUT!! there are a few effect traps as I have found out.

Nice start and yes I have been there, but there are many roads to go.
"Our education can be the limitation to our imagination, and our dreams"

So With out a dream, there is no vision.

Old and future wheel videos
https://www.youtube.com/user/ABthehammer/videos

Alan
User avatar
preoccupied
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1990
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:28 am
Location: Michigan
Contact:

re: kinetic energy hypothesis

Post by preoccupied »

wise old AB_Hammer, vague as always...

Man, like, dude, you know, like I was saying that centrifugal force does not exist - yet you claim I am working towards a CF effect. Thanks for the compliment that contradicts my hypothesis.
User avatar
AB Hammer
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3728
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:46 am
Location: La.
Contact:

Post by AB Hammer »

preoccupied

I tend to be veg for a reason. Or I would be giving everything away. There is a way to keep 1 side full and the ascending side empty as Bessler said. There are also other approaches that can be done as well. 4 years ago I nearly lost my thumb to a wheel that was spinning about 60rpm but it broke when it hit my thumb. This wheel has gone through some smoothing designs and is in the process to get finished to its final stage which will be smooth and low noise which reduces vibration. But that is waiting for the back pay the VA is owed to me. Then I will be able to take all the time I need to finish.
User avatar
preoccupied
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1990
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:28 am
Location: Michigan
Contact:

re: kinetic energy hypothesis

Post by preoccupied »

AB_Hammer,

You should join up with a University and share credit with whatever they find to contribute with your design. It will remain protected like all University work is until publication. It will patent and be distributed in products like University work does. You should really donate your contributions to a University and ask for a grant or something, if you have something, like you are willing to spend your VA money on. You wouldn't need to spend any of your own money on anything if you had something with merit because then a University would fund the project. And the same goes for the lot of ya... The only reason I'm not brown nosing a University professor right now is because I am not intelligent enough to. As soon as I'm prepared to go to college that will be the only method I would use to study Bessler's wheel. I have my limitations, I will admit, but I have been hit on the head before.

Preoccupied
User avatar
AB Hammer
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3728
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:46 am
Location: La.
Contact:

Post by AB Hammer »

The first question to come to mind is. Will a college listen to a mid 50s year old blacksmith that does not have a bachelors degree or has ever attended a college, about something that may break the laws of Physics as we know Physics today?

I think I will save the gas until I have a couple of running wheels finished first. LOL



P.S. the world is full of college educated and idiots and sometime all to often they can be one and the same. Common knowledge is learned by experience, not always found in books.

ps edited to correct spelling.
Last edited by AB Hammer on Sun Jul 06, 2014 11:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jim_mich
Addict
Addict
Posts: 7467
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Post by jim_mich »

...
User avatar
Ed
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2049
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 7:13 pm
Contact:

re: kinetic energy hypothesis

Post by Ed »

Nice Jim. See, you can do that more often.
User avatar
preoccupied
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1990
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:28 am
Location: Michigan
Contact:

re: kinetic energy hypothesis

Post by preoccupied »

Jim_Mich don't let Ed shut you up. Your post was "..." but it should have been a Jim_Mich extravaganza.
User avatar
jim_mich
Addict
Addict
Posts: 7467
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Post by jim_mich »

My message was intended to be private to AB Hammer, and I accidentally clicked the wrong button. Nothing more. Nothing less. And since one cannot delete posts, nor make blank posts I simply erased it as you can see.

No big deal, except in Ed's mind.

Image
User avatar
Ed
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2049
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 7:13 pm
Contact:

re: kinetic energy hypothesis

Post by Ed »

Jim, you obviously missed my point.
User avatar
jim_mich
Addict
Addict
Posts: 7467
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Post by jim_mich »

Ed, I obviously got your point that you prefer me to say nothing.


Image
User avatar
Ed
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2049
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 7:13 pm
Contact:

re: kinetic energy hypothesis

Post by Ed »

Nope, that wasn't it. It has to do with what you were going to tell Alan here but then decided against doing it publicly.
User avatar
jim_mich
Addict
Addict
Posts: 7467
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Post by jim_mich »

What I told Alan was meant from the very beginning to be private. I did not "then decide" differently. I simply hit the wrong button and posted in this thread rather than as a private message. And in less than 10 seconds I attempted to erased it, but got hit with the "you can't edit that quick" message, and had to wait it out. I then posted my message exactly where I originally intended it to go, privately to Alan. If you saw it, then that was unintentional. If it weren't for the dang limit on posting too soon, then the chances of you seeing it would have been near zero.

Ed, you are being a bully.

Image
User avatar
preoccupied
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1990
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:28 am
Location: Michigan
Contact:

re: kinetic energy hypothesis

Post by preoccupied »

Jim_Mich... I always appreciate your input. I don't care what anybody else thinks. I hope what you shared with AB_hammer was personal and that you are not excluding me from some juicy Bessler Wheel, cool stuff.

Ed, did you ungreen me? When you appreciated me in another thread I went to two greens. Did you ungreen me because I told Jim_Mich to speak his mind?
Post Reply