"Centrifugal potential energy".MrVibrating wrote:However i'm not proposing using G as an MoI modifier - which i'm considering in terms of "centrifugal potential energy" (CF-PE), a quantity that is of direct interest, together with RKE - G could of course be used for this, but for now, in the interests of purity, i'm considering making the radial translations arbitrarily-quickly, while passing through horizontal alignment, so with negligible change in height WRT gravity.
A funny but peculiar blast from the past: I once heard someone trying out some one-size-fits-all-theory. I kept asking about the specifics, as it couldn't be all his various explanations at the same time. In all reply-vagueness he scratched some surfaces about many things but I kept waiting for one single consistent explanation about his "Ersatz"-thingy: I think he meant Centrifugal Potential Energy as I suspect it to be the most fitting, but it's not my theory so how should I know? Also he had to get rid of some collateral explanations - the inventor should know his own invention best, even when it's just a single word.
I thought it was a very interesting subject, hence I insisted, but somehow we never could get past that definition-barrier...unfortunately.
(next page please. -- Oh darn, now I'm on top of the 3rd :-)
My topic "the importance of raising weights" is about an arbitrary translation at infinite speed... horizontal translations do not work: Horizontal translation IS Height-For-Width. The one thing working is vertically up. Only a slight issue, the energy gain of the increased torque equals the energy requirement of raising this weight.
Tadaa!I'm not intending this as a 'perpetual overbalancing' concept, so if that is what it reduces to, it'll hopefully reach that conclusion swiftly..