Centrifugal vs Gravity
Moderator: scott
- Joel Wright
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 220
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2003 4:43 am
- Location: U.S.A.
- Contact:
Centrifugal vs Gravity
Updated: 05:39 PM EST
Star Escaping the Milky Way Galaxy
By Deborah Zabarenko, Reuters
AFP/Getty Images
In this artist's rendition, an outcast star is zooming out of the Milky Way, ejected from the galactic center after a close encounter with a black hole.
WASHINGTON (Feb. 9) - An outcast star is zooming out of the Milky Way, the first ever seen escaping the galaxy, astronomers reported on Tuesday.
The star is heading for the emptiness of intergalactic space after being ejected from the heart of the Milky Way following a close encounter with a black hole, said Warren Brown, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
The outcast is going so fast -- over 1.5 million mph -- that astronomers believe it was lobbed out of the galaxy by the tremendous force of a black hole thought to sit at the Milky Way's center. That speed is about twice the velocity needed to escape the galaxy's grip, Brown said by telephone.
"We have never before seen a star moving fast enough to completely escape the confines of our galaxy," he said. "We're tempted to call it the outcast star because it was forcefully tossed from its home."
The star used to be part of a binary pair, waltzing with its companion star close to the rim of the black hole. In this case, "close" is a relative term; the actual distance was probably about 50 times the 93 million-mile distance between Earth and the sun.
Talk About It
· Post Messages
As the two stars twirled around each other, they were pulled faster and faster toward the edge of the black hole, one of those monster drains in space whose gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape once it is consumed.
While the companion star was captured by the black hole, the outcast continued on its whirling path around its edge.
Objects go faster the closer they get to black holes and this star was probably moving at extraordinary speed, perhaps as high as 20 million mph. That very speed, coupled with the speed of its twirling, sent the outcast zooming toward the edge of the Milky Way and beyond.
At this point, the outcast is about 180,000 light-years from Earth, in an outer region of the galaxy known as the halo. A light-year is about 6 trillion miles, the distance light travels in a year.
02/08/05 16:52 ET
Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
Star Escaping the Milky Way Galaxy
By Deborah Zabarenko, Reuters
AFP/Getty Images
In this artist's rendition, an outcast star is zooming out of the Milky Way, ejected from the galactic center after a close encounter with a black hole.
WASHINGTON (Feb. 9) - An outcast star is zooming out of the Milky Way, the first ever seen escaping the galaxy, astronomers reported on Tuesday.
The star is heading for the emptiness of intergalactic space after being ejected from the heart of the Milky Way following a close encounter with a black hole, said Warren Brown, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
The outcast is going so fast -- over 1.5 million mph -- that astronomers believe it was lobbed out of the galaxy by the tremendous force of a black hole thought to sit at the Milky Way's center. That speed is about twice the velocity needed to escape the galaxy's grip, Brown said by telephone.
"We have never before seen a star moving fast enough to completely escape the confines of our galaxy," he said. "We're tempted to call it the outcast star because it was forcefully tossed from its home."
The star used to be part of a binary pair, waltzing with its companion star close to the rim of the black hole. In this case, "close" is a relative term; the actual distance was probably about 50 times the 93 million-mile distance between Earth and the sun.
Talk About It
· Post Messages
As the two stars twirled around each other, they were pulled faster and faster toward the edge of the black hole, one of those monster drains in space whose gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape once it is consumed.
While the companion star was captured by the black hole, the outcast continued on its whirling path around its edge.
Objects go faster the closer they get to black holes and this star was probably moving at extraordinary speed, perhaps as high as 20 million mph. That very speed, coupled with the speed of its twirling, sent the outcast zooming toward the edge of the Milky Way and beyond.
At this point, the outcast is about 180,000 light-years from Earth, in an outer region of the galaxy known as the halo. A light-year is about 6 trillion miles, the distance light travels in a year.
02/08/05 16:52 ET
Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
Work with gravity and gravity will work for you.There are more than two sides to a wheel.
re: Centrifugal vs Gravity
This just shows that gravity can do work even though it is considered a conservative force.
Hmm, two weights or masses working as a pair.
Hmm, two weights or masses working as a pair.
Vic Hays
Ambassador MFG LLC
Ambassador MFG LLC
re: Centrifugal vs Gravity
Gravity is not supplying the work. The increased momentum of the star comes at the expense of momentum of the black hole.
Re: re: Centrifugal vs Gravity
How exactly did the black hole lose momentum? Was it rotational or velocity through space?ovyyus wrote:Gravity is not supplying the work. The increased momentum of the star comes at the expense of momentum of the black hole.
Vic Hays
Ambassador MFG LLC
Ambassador MFG LLC
re: Centrifugal vs Gravity
'Gravity assist' (should be called 'planet assist') is the same principle at a smaller scale to the star/blackhole proposal:
http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/ ... l&edu=high
http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/ ... l&edu=high
re: Centrifugal vs Gravity
I think this depends on your point of view. How do we know that the black hole had "momentum? In relationship to what? Perhaps it was stationary and the star actually started it moving. In this case gravity was the contributing energy.
Vic Hays
Ambassador MFG LLC
Ambassador MFG LLC
Re: re: Centrifugal vs Gravity
Point of view. The universe is said to be everything, yet it is expanding. What is it expanding into if it's already everythingVic Hays wrote:I think this depends on your point of view. How do we know that the black hole had "momentum? In relationship to what? Perhaps it was stationary and the star actually started it moving. In this case gravity was the contributing energy.
re: Centrifugal vs Gravity
Actually in this case I think it was that the star had been spiraling toward the black hole, losing potential and gaining kinetic energy, for who knows how long. At some point it got awefully close to both the black hole and another star which was moving quickly too, and they interacted via gravity assit and launched one star. The other probably got lauched toward the black hole and has been consumed.
To answer your question Vic, which one is "really" moving in this case is not relevant, because the math predicts the same outcome for all equivalent reference frames. So the black hole could be stationary and the star is moving at speed 2 in a direction, or the star could be stationary and the black hole is moving at speed 2 in the opposite direction. (And the black hole's momentum is probably substantially rotational relative to the galaxy, hence my first point, since it doesn't have linear or instantaneously-revolutionary momentum to give away).
To answer your question Vic, which one is "really" moving in this case is not relevant, because the math predicts the same outcome for all equivalent reference frames. So the black hole could be stationary and the star is moving at speed 2 in a direction, or the star could be stationary and the black hole is moving at speed 2 in the opposite direction. (And the black hole's momentum is probably substantially rotational relative to the galaxy, hence my first point, since it doesn't have linear or instantaneously-revolutionary momentum to give away).
Disclaimer: I reserve the right not to know what I'm talking about and not to mention this possibility in my posts. This disclaimer also applies to sentences I claim are quotes from anybody, including me.
re: Centrifugal vs Gravity
Gravity contributes no additional energy in the planetary slingshot maneuver just like David's slingshot contributed no additional energy to the stone that killed Goliath.
re: Centrifugal vs Gravity
If that reply is to me, I have no reason to disagree.
Disclaimer: I reserve the right not to know what I'm talking about and not to mention this possibility in my posts. This disclaimer also applies to sentences I claim are quotes from anybody, including me.
re: Centrifugal vs Gravity
ovyyus As the two stars twirled around each other, they were pulled faster and faster toward the edge of the black hole, one of those monster drains in space whose gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape once it is consumed _____________________________________________________________ is gravity doing no work when it holds light back?
the uneducated
if your gona be dumb you gota be tough
Who need drugs when you can have fatigue toxins and caffeine
if your gona be dumb you gota be tough
Who need drugs when you can have fatigue toxins and caffeine
re: Centrifugal vs Gravity
Oh, I completely forgot that the article actually said there were two stars! I guess that would explain how I came up with it...
About the light, in theory no, because the as the light moves out it gains potential energy.
About the light, in theory no, because the as the light moves out it gains potential energy.
Disclaimer: I reserve the right not to know what I'm talking about and not to mention this possibility in my posts. This disclaimer also applies to sentences I claim are quotes from anybody, including me.
re: Centrifugal vs Gravity
Oh, I completely forgot that the article actually said there were two stars! I guess that would explain how I came up with it...
About the light, in theory no, because the as the light moves out it gains potential energy _____________________________________________________________in a black it does not move out
About the light, in theory no, because the as the light moves out it gains potential energy _____________________________________________________________in a black it does not move out
the uneducated
if your gona be dumb you gota be tough
Who need drugs when you can have fatigue toxins and caffeine
if your gona be dumb you gota be tough
Who need drugs when you can have fatigue toxins and caffeine
re: Centrifugal vs Gravity
I thought you were refering to the red-shift related loss of energy as light moves away from a black hole. No, gravity does no work on light in a black hole because the light continues on down into the singularity, gaining energy, but looseing potential all the way. At the event horizontal, some light hovers motionless.
Disclaimer: I reserve the right not to know what I'm talking about and not to mention this possibility in my posts. This disclaimer also applies to sentences I claim are quotes from anybody, including me.
re: Centrifugal vs Gravity
that's neat i would like to see that
the uneducated
if your gona be dumb you gota be tough
Who need drugs when you can have fatigue toxins and caffeine
if your gona be dumb you gota be tough
Who need drugs when you can have fatigue toxins and caffeine