My YouTube Channel

[UbWe]

This is for the people who might visit this forum. And they can read people's posts and see that I am not liked in here.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6p2S0 ... j46qVXnHXg

I've done much more work and the videos on YouTube that are private will show this. And with 2 different builds being built
simultaneously, I know other people have done better work and more builds. It's like when I was a kid, should I speak Engleske
or Norwegian? And now it's should I build my design or should I build Bessler's Wheel? Or is the U.S. better or is Europe better?
With"perpetual motion", I won't get into whether or not Europeans are better than Americans or Americans are better than
Europeans. And with perpetual motion, I have discussed it with Filipinos. They're Asian so it's not about who is better. And I need
to remind myself that SketchUp is supportive of my efforts when they don't need to be. And why does this matter?
Non-profit groups might ask if we can work together. SketchUp would help with that. With the war in Ukraine and emergency
power needed, file sharing on SketchUp would help with the design and build process. While they are a business, they can practice
some socialism.
And for the people who visit this forum, read National Geographic. Access to clean water is very important for many reasons and
not everyone has it.

FYI, because SketchUp has helped me, I demonstrate 2 working wheels and I might ask them to unveil my builds. I'll show them
on my YouTube channel but they'll make my work known. Even showing Bessler's Wheel will be good enough. My own design
would just be icing on the cake.

[UbWe]

:)

[UbWe]

For legal purposes, my name is James Lindgaard and I am Free Energy Systems on YouTube. My work on Bessler's Wheel is my work as
videos starting in 2013 will show I have done physical work t realize what Bessler knew. And with my invention, it is that, my invention. This is
also my invention. I simply call it a Water Wheel in Water.
When 2 lead weights sink, it is obvious that the lead weight at bottom center will rise. This is what allows for the wheel to rotate. If you know what Archimedes ran down the middle of the street shouting Eureka!!! then you'll understand why it works. If not then maybe learn something about
Archimedes?
And with a show at Utrecht University, if video of Aldo Costa's wheel counts then 6 or 7 running wheels will be displayed. And since perpetual
motion is impossible, I do understand science. I am also aware of the mistake made in logic (how scientists reasoned it). This is what will make
such a show important. Actual physics will be discussed when talking about perpetual motion.
And because I am her fan and she lives in the Netherlands and is German, she can do the drum roll to revealing the display while also representing
Germany as its Ambassador. I have made both Dr. Jaski and Sina-Drums aware of this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMJiZxw6Ef4
Having such a goal helps to keep me motivated.

[Tarsier79]

This is not your invention. The same principle has been proposed many times before. This device will be as still as all of your others. You do not understand Besslers wheel. You do not understand gravity or physics. Your delusion has created your entire world inide your mind.

[JUBAT]

This is not your invention. The same principle has been proposed many times before. This device will be as still as all of your others. You do not understand Besslers wheel. You do not understand gravity or physics. Your delusion has created your entire world inide your mind.

Oh I can't wait to see what professur Lingaard has to say about this! Could it be racism? Maybe even a hint of molestation? Maybe you're AB Hammer? The plot thickens and I've got my popcorn ready!

[daxwc]

Sic him you little Tarsier monkey 8P . Just joking but he does look like he got up on the wrong side of the bed.

[daxwc]

Or maybe its this. This AI image maker is cool.

[Tarsier79]

Ha ha, sometimes I cannot take stupidity before I wake up properly...

Even though some things the "King of Stupidity" says riles me up, I have to remember anything he says actually means nothing.

[UbWe]

This is not your invention. The same principle has been proposed many times before. This device will be as still as all of your others. You do not understand Besslers wheel. You do not understand gravity or physics. Your delusion has created your entire world inide your mind.

You misspelled "inside". 🙃

[Tarsier79]

Let me try again:

You should remove your head from inside your colon.

I am done feeling sorry for you. You actively choose to be a narcissistic A-hole.

Get mental help or don't. Your life, your problems.

[preoccupied]

I honestly don't read through a lot of what you talk about Ubwe because you have weird complaints and I'm more of a skimmer right now. I'm not disregarding that you might be an A-hole like Tarsier79 said, I am just not paying very close attention. However, I noticed that you tried to establish a weight in your first post using a lever system. You misunderstand gears. If you use a lever against an outer rim you deduct the distance from the main axle to the gears fulcrum/axle. But there is a loop hole that I have discovered and have tried to get people to talk about.

As you can see you can use a 90 degree path in which you can have the extended lever out to the outer rim any distance you desire. If you had space you could have the lever be infinite distance as I've drawn it. This also works for 45 degrees in a different set up (I think). This obvious thing here though is drawn exactly to have someone understand it. I lack your building aspirations but feel free to do a build that uses my logic that I'm sharing here. I hope that I'm not a narcissistic a hole too. I mean I don't know I guess I've claimed due to deceiving myself that I thought I had working designs. But I'm not trying to do anything but bring up dialog about the topics that I bring up which I'm not getting very much of and that's frustrating. I don't have a lot going on for me in my head I will admit too. I am very limited mentally and full of brain malfunctions and it's just that I haven't exercised my brain much since my last injuries to my head. I had extremely high potential when I was much younger before injuries especially before my earliest injuries in elementary school in which I think that I got a doctorate degree in kindergarten from like Columbia or Yale or something ridiculous, I don't remember. I'm sure that if I wasn't such a bump on a log...

[UbWe]

I honestly don't read through a lot of what you talk about Ubwe because you have weird complaints and I'm more of a skimmer right now. I'm not disregarding that you might be an A-hole like Tarsier79 said, I am just not paying very close attention. However, I noticed that you tried to establish a weight in your first post using a lever system. You misunderstand gears. If you use a lever against an outer rim you deduct the distance from the main axle to the gears fulcrum/axle. But there is a loop hole that I have discovered and have tried to get people to talk about.90 degree path on gear and infinite possible lever example.png

As you can see you can use a 90 degree path in which you can have the extended lever out to the outer rim any distance you desire. If you had space you could have the lever be infinite distance as I've drawn it. This also works for 45 degrees in a different set up (I think). This obvious thing here though is drawn exactly to have someone understand it. I lack your building aspirations but feel free to do a build that uses my logic that I'm sharing here. I hope that I'm not a narcissistic a hole too. I mean I don't know I guess I've claimed due to deceiving myself that I thought I had working designs. But I'm not trying to do anything but bring up dialog about the topics that I bring up which I'm not getting very much of and that's frustrating. I don't have a lot going on for me in my head I will admit too. I am very limited mentally and full of brain malfunctions and it's just that I haven't exercised my brain much since my last injuries to my head. I had extremely high potential when I was much younger before injuries especially before my earliest injuries in elementary school in which I think that I got a doctorate degree in kindergarten from like Columbia or Yale or something ridiculous, I don't remember. I'm sure that if I wasn't such a bump on a log...

I have a question for you. What do you think the IPCC will say when I make this known;

Ozone depletion to date would have been greater if not for the historical increases in CO2 and CH4.

Do you think the IPCC will like me? I've downloaded their 2013 report which NOAA quoted. I'll need the actual source. When the IPCC
wrote that in their report they weren't saying we need to reduce ODSs first. Then CO2 could be lowered but they never said that. And when that
by itself challenges policy on climate change that the IPCC has been promoting, everybody will be talking about me.
Do you and your friends here know anyone who would want to be in that position? Basically I'll need to understand what over 700 scientists at
the IPCC doesn't understand. You guys are nothing compared to that kind of pressure.

[preoccupied]

I learned that the ozone replenishes after an electrical storm and that hair spray or bug spray or something chemically destroyed the ozone. I don't have a source. I had seen something on YouTube, I don't have a source, that the ozone is getting better after removing the aerosol sprays that were chemically damaging it. If I'm right then the gradual thunder storms have helped replenish the ozone and it will get better as more storms happen.

This is a fun song by a band called O-Zone. I'm sure you speak their language fluently because you are so smart now.

O-Zone - Dragostea Din Tei
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnopHCL1Jk8

[JUBAT]

>Do you think the IPCC will like me? I've downloaded their 2013 report which NOAA quoted. I'll need the actual source. When the IPCC
>wrote that in their report they weren't saying we need to reduce ODSs first. Then CO2 could be lowered but they never said that. And >when that
>by itself challenges policy on climate change that the IPCC has been promoting, everybody will be talking about me.

Heaven forbid. I'll be watching for the name James Lingaard in lights.

>Do you and your friends here know anyone who would want to be in that position? Basically I'll need to understand what over 700 >scientists at
>the IPCC doesn't understand. You guys are nothing compared to that kind of pressure.

700 scientists being proved wrong by James Lingaard? And then to top it all off, we are all nothing on this board as compared to that kind of pressure.

Make that 702 scientists because you need to add Einstein and Newton.

[UbWe]

>Do you think the IPCC will like me? I've downloaded their 2013 report which NOAA quoted. I'll need the actual source. When the IPCC
>wrote that in their report they weren't saying we need to reduce ODSs first. Then CO2 could be lowered but they never said that. And >when that
>by itself challenges policy on climate change that the IPCC has been promoting, everybody will be talking about me.

Heaven forbid. I'll be watching for the name James Lingaard in lights.

>Do you and your friends here know anyone who would want to be in that position? Basically I'll need to understand what over 700 >scientists at
>the IPCC doesn't understand. You guys are nothing compared to that kind of pressure.

700 scientists being proved wrong by James Lingaard? And then to top it all off, we are all nothing on this board as compared to that kind of pressure.

Make that 702 scientists because you need to add Einstein and Newton.

And we're back to what have you learned the last 18 years Alan? Anything or did you just get older and fatter? And when the church wants me
to be its witness I'll say that you are the perfect body of Jesus because you're a Christian and because you know what the Bible says you have
the perfect intellect of Jesus. That is what preachers teach in church. You're the "living" Jesus.
An example;

1 Corinthians 1:18; For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written: ‘I will destroy the wisdom of the wise; the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate.’

Yep, the Bible describes Alan as God and Jesus is God. And Alan, there are scientists who quit the IPCC because it became like this forum. Notice
how only your "children" post in here?

Psalms 127:3-5 New International Version (NIV)
Like arrows in the hands of a warrior are children born in one's youth. Blessed is the man whose quiver is full of them. They will not be put to shame when they contend with their opponents in court.

Yep Alan, you have no shame trying to ruin someone's life who is disabled. I think when I finish my Bessler build that people will be shocked to
find out that orpheus.org says it's okay to attack someone who needs Bessler's Wheel to have surgery and all because I'm like Bessler, I'm not ethnically pure.

p.s., Bill F. aka oyvvus, I'm sure you saw the posts where Jubat said I had to have my rectum removed because of ab hammer sodomizing me. And
yet you thought it was a beautiful thing that he was grooming me. When I show what the IPCC said in its report, it would be like my showing where ab hammer had been sodomizing me and then Jubat wants to groom me when I'm heterosexual. In the public eye, the court of public opinion might be shocked by what groups do that don't have to answer to anyone. And what the IPCC said;

Carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) are each important to climate forcing and to the levels of stratospheric ozone (see Chapter 2). In terms of the globally averaged ozone column, additional N2O leads to lower ozone levels, whereas additional CO2 and CH4 lead to higher ozone levels. Ozone depletion to date would have been greater if not for the historical increases in CO2 and CH4. The net impact on ozone recovery and future levels of stratospheric ozone thus depends on the future abundances of these gases.
https://csl.noaa.gov/assessments/ozone/ ... y/ch5.html

If you guys can understand English, then you should understand what these words mean;

Ozone depletion to date would have been greater if not for the historical increases in CO2 and CH4. The net impact on ozone recovery and future levels of stratospheric ozone thus depends on the future abundances of these gases.

And yet the IPCC says we need to reduce CO2 emissions? If you guys can't understand something when the most basic English language is used,
maybe you need to go back to school and learn to understand the English language?