Posted by keith adams U.S. (67.217.181.113) on February 28, 2003 at 07:47:45:
In Reply to: Re: Besslers wheel discovery posted by Øystein Rustad on October 22, 2001 at 05:03:12:
: Hello again !
: YES a 10` model, because I will not "miss" this one.
: If I build it too small, maby the gained force is too small to overcome the friction and mechanical losses, and I will test negative on something that could work !!
: Oh yes, I see the satan relation,,, hmmm too bad !!
: No, not a word yet, the physicist is still not "speaking" !
: Maybe he found the theory too interesting?? And steels the idea!
: I hope not!
: Regards
: Øystein Rustad
:
:
: : Oystein,
: : Glad to hear your testing is going well. A 10' model? Why so big? Seems like a lot of material and work for a prototype(?).
: : As far as the strange page on the Gary Novak site, it is this one: http://nov55.com/joul.html
: : I just added a link to it on my site under "Perpectives," as well as a new link under "Theories."
: : Any word on your scheme yet from the physicist?
: : Take Care,
: : Scott
: :
: : : Hello again !!
: : : About the nov55 WEB-site:
: : : I can`t see actually what you mean.
: : : I never saw the relation to satan???
: : : Mabye som words that are often used in religious terms, but,,,
: : : Where are actually Satan mentioned??
: : : My testing goes good!
: : : Nothing negative to report yet!
: : : My 10 feet wheel is standing in my garage, The remaining things are the weights. Have not got my hands on the right materials/people to get the proper weights !!!
: : : For the moment I am having my basic principle analysed by a physican,
: : : the first report was laws of physics.. bla,bla..
: : : After proper explaining, so he could understand the function, I have not heard nothing for 10 days!!
: : : (I was a litle bit sceptic to describe the idea to a unknown person, but done is done...
: : : It can maybe be a litle problem when a mathematic/physican not can use the overall formula to describe energy etc..
: : : My statement is still:
: : : It is possible to make a lift easier (less energy) than it normally would do, moving the axle in the same way!!!
: : : But mathematics has only one way to describe the energy that is used in a lift.. that is : how much weight,how high, how much friction ! This is basicly true, but can be altered !!!
: :
: : :
: : :
:
: :
: : :
: : : : Hey Oystein,
: : : : Sorry for the long delay. I enjoyed the site you recommended. I think some of the perspectives on energy were very interesting. The author really started to lose me, though, with all the talk about Satan. Was is that about? I would like to link to the site from this one, but am a little reluctant for people to think that I endorse the Satan stuff.
: : : : Hope your experiments are going well. I am working on my own pet design these days. Never enough time to keep the experiments going, though!
: : : : Best, hope you have time to report to this board again soon,
: : : : -Scott
: : : : : I will keep reporting on this board....
: : : : : Meanwhile read this web site :
: : : : : nov55.com/ener.html
: : : : : Something in the direction I have measured...
: : : : :
keith here very interested i am building a machine that run on water im interested in some of the info u are talking about satan????????????????????? what does he have to do with it