Re: Thoughts...


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]

Posted by Scott Ellis (216.87.95.64) on March 14, 2002 at 23:46:48:

In Reply to: Re: Thoughts... posted by Christopher on March 14, 2002 at 14:04:44:

You bring up a good point Christopher! That was actually an oversight on my part. I had originally sent this message as an email to some friends, then I copied it onto the discussion board and forgot to remove that part.

As for your question:
To me, any scheme employing weights, springs, levers, ramps, pendulums... any purely mechanical contraptions at all (even gyroscopes and magnets), would be considered a "level 1" device (as you describe it). I am sure that Bessler could have made use of any and/or all of these things in his wheel.

To me, a "level 2" device would be electrical or chemical in nature. There are plenty of efforts going on in this area as well (see Keelynet and JNL labs). I think it is possible but quite unlikely that Bessler made use of these principles.

If Bessler's wheel was purely mechanical, then I think it must have exploited a dynamic physical principle that is not at all obvious. The sheer number of people who have tried and failed in this endeaver illustrate that fact. So I think natural but obscure physical principles (like parametric oscillations and impulse/impact) are good places to look for possible insight.

Best,
Scott

: Scott,

: Please take this as it's meant, all in fun but...
: "keep these ideas in confidence" ??
: You have a globaly available website. You're sharing with more
: people than I have ever met. I just thought that was kinda
: funny. :-)

: Now, I'd like to answer your question with another question
: right back at you...

: What is your opinion, and what do you think the general concensus
: is, on the different "types" of "free energy" devices? What I
: mean is, your suggested approaches are very complex, as are many
: of the other contemporary approaches I read about on different
: sites. Do you think most people have totally given up on purely
: mechanical, "level 1" type devices in favor of more complex
: approaches that exploit the stranger properties of physics?

: The reason I ask is two-fold. First, I am genuinely interested
: in your answer to this question as I have stuck to my guns and
: worked only on "type 1" devices since the first day I ran across
: your site. Second, I have no idea how else to reply to your post
: since those particular ideas are far beyond what I have employed so
: far in my designs :-)

: Thanks




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Comments:
(Archived Message)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]