Posted by Scott Ellis (216.87.95.64) on January 22, 2003 at 23:00:22:
As you all know, Georg Kuenstler has been creating quite a bit of buzz around here lately. Unfortunately, I think the language barrier and other factors might have contributed to some confusion on the matter. I would like to try to help clarify the situation by summarizing my understanding, as best I can.
Georg, I hope you'll take this opportunity to help set the record straight, and respond to any part of my description that is inaccurate...
1. Your "working" device is driven by a drill press, and is designed to exploit an overunity principle involving "centrifugal" force.
2. You have measured the device to be overunity, and are employing the services of a local university to confirm the measurement some time this month.
3. You believe that Bessler's wheel might have been driven by a by-product of the same overunity principle found in your "working" device.
4. You do not have an actual "self-running," classical perpetual motion machine, which moves by itself under the force of gravity alone. You do have plans for such a machine under patent review, however.
I genuinely hope that my statements are correct, and that they help to clear up any lingering misunderstandings.
Best,
Scott