PM classification...

[iacob alex]

...as we know at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion ...and here:1.Basic principles/1.1 Classification ) , is "prohibitive" .

It's a triple pessimistic point of view ...but this "nothing" is of three kinds???

My point of view is triple , too...but optimistic , if we take into consideration :

www.robotee.com/index.php/robotic-mecha ... ers-51008/

...and we introduce the variable/pulsatory/oscillatory lever concept...as an Archimedes "redivivus".

For the moment can it be a "tragediante-comediante" replica ,or simply , no more than a bet , an act of laying a wager?

Al_ex

[iacob alex]

.....related to three classes of variable/oscillatory leverage , as a basic principle to imagine and test three classes of ( self ) running gravity powered devices , has an "on the edge " tested design , at :

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=A5pPaTqd-4w

Maybe , ABtheHammer's inspiration is " responsible " for the up-here Class 2 variable leverage...if he will succeed it.

A Class 3 variable leverage ( not tested...) , has a short depicting , at :
www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text036.jpg

A different stimulation of the mind (Remzi Eyupoglu) for something on the "border" of a Class 1 variable leverage (if he makes a simple "cut"...) , at :
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Upp-Xr5JAg0

Without the same " necessary cut " , you have a test of this design , at :
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9YLkoJz7rM

So , with a such variety of levers , we can imagine and test a lot of variable/oscillatory devices...let's hope , some of them to be "self"-
Again Goethe's quote : "in all things it is better to hope than to despair".

Al_ex

[Rafael Ti]

Hi Alex. The last video you've posted doesn't exist.

[iacob alex]

Hi !
Sorry about the address....let's try again for "Unbalanced lever" ,at :
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=c9YLkoJz7rM
It plays three masses ,as follows : a centered pair of masses and a pendular mass ...not a continuous unbalanced lever , as a starting idea.
Al_ex