Bessler Wheel question
Moderator: scott
- Unbalanced
- Aficionado
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 6:53 pm
- Location: Bend, OR
re: Bessler Wheel question
@veproject1
I look forward to seeing your finished model. Your earlier projects have shown a quality of construction hither-to unequalled.
Curtis
I look forward to seeing your finished model. Your earlier projects have shown a quality of construction hither-to unequalled.
Curtis
-
- Addict
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:21 pm
re: Bessler Wheel question
@veproject1, I see on your profile that you are an engineer. I also like your quality builds. Could you please spell out your intentions for making these models and videos. I do wish you explained to your viewers that every model you made don't work but this is what it would look like if it did work. Your objective? ??
. I can assure the reader that there is something special behind the stork's bills.
- Unbalanced
- Aficionado
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 6:53 pm
- Location: Bend, OR
re: Bessler Wheel question
@Veproject1
In this and other similar illustrations, the wheel was shown as being capable of lifting, pumping, and milling, all necessary functions in the mining industry. I do not believe that these illustrations were meant to demonstrate the wheels ability to do these various works simultaneously.
I am unable to describe Bessler's mechanism but in my opinion the illustration of the Merseberg wheel was akin to an advertisement aimed at the mining industry.Could you, please, exactly describe a mechanism that lifts hammers and a box. What is behind of this picture?
In this and other similar illustrations, the wheel was shown as being capable of lifting, pumping, and milling, all necessary functions in the mining industry. I do not believe that these illustrations were meant to demonstrate the wheels ability to do these various works simultaneously.
re: Bessler Wheel question
a image look and comparison at the measurement of Bessler's Wheel,
using reference from http://www.orffyre.com/measurements.html,
simply trace the shape over the image from the site
PS: height of human figure is 6 feet or 1.82 m
using reference from http://www.orffyre.com/measurements.html,
simply trace the shape over the image from the site
PS: height of human figure is 6 feet or 1.82 m
re: Bessler Wheel question
The Merseburg and the Kassel wheel were both 12 feet diameter.
re: Bessler Wheel question
@veproject1
It is very possible, that these drawing (Kassel & Merseburg) show and hint to the secret internal working mech principle.
Suggesting the hammers/taps OR 'weights/rope' OR water/screw being part of the mech....
regards
ruggero ;-)
It is very possible, that these drawing (Kassel & Merseburg) show and hint to the secret internal working mech principle.
Suggesting the hammers/taps OR 'weights/rope' OR water/screw being part of the mech....
regards
ruggero ;-)
Contradictions do not exist.
Whenever you think you are facing a contradiction, check your premises.
You will find that one of them is wrong. - Ayn Rand -
Whenever you think you are facing a contradiction, check your premises.
You will find that one of them is wrong. - Ayn Rand -
re: Bessler Wheel question
some eyewitness's account on the weight of the wheel
Several such weights, wrapped in his handkerchief, he let us weigh in our hands to estimate their weight. They were judged to be about four pounds each, and their shape was definitely cylindrical.
maybe can make an estimated/appropriate guess on the size and shape of the weightBefore translocating the wheel, the Inventor who was performing the test for the officially appointed Commissioners, took out the weights and permitted one of them to be touched, wrapped in a handkerchief. He did not allow the weight to be touched on the end, but lengthwise, it felt cylindrical and not very thick.
re: Bessler Wheel question
About the size & shape of a coke can.
re: Bessler Wheel question
I would say the big cylinder, but only because I am biased to a concept.
"not very thick"??? In which plane, vertical or horizontal?
"not very thick"??? In which plane, vertical or horizontal?
What goes around, comes around.
A 12 fl. oz. Coke can is 21.62625 cubic inches. (They're actually closer to 23.5 cubic inches since there's air space in the can.)
Lead weighs 0.4105 lbs per cubic inch.
... 4_lb ÷ 0.4105 = 9.744 cubic inches of lead
... 21.62625_fl.oz. × 0.4105 = 8.8899 lbs. of lead will fill a Coke can.
Actually a Coke can filled completely full of lead will weigh about 9.5 lbs when the air space is filled.
A 2.60 inch diameter 12 oz. Coke can when cut to 1.835 inches long will hold 4 lbs of lead.
So the lead weights were more like slightly smaller than half of a 12 oz. Coke can.
:)}
Lead weighs 0.4105 lbs per cubic inch.
... 4_lb ÷ 0.4105 = 9.744 cubic inches of lead
... 21.62625_fl.oz. × 0.4105 = 8.8899 lbs. of lead will fill a Coke can.
Actually a Coke can filled completely full of lead will weigh about 9.5 lbs when the air space is filled.
A 2.60 inch diameter 12 oz. Coke can when cut to 1.835 inches long will hold 4 lbs of lead.
So the lead weights were more like slightly smaller than half of a 12 oz. Coke can.
:)}
re: Bessler Wheel question
Sounds like something disk shaped.it felt cylindrical and not very thick.
N.B. jim_mich's calcs will be close for weight to volume - since the weights weren't allowed to be handled or seen at the ends we might conclude that they were pierced lengthwise with a hole, or perhaps a recess etc - so the volume might be larger than approx half a coke can depending on the volume of lead missing ?
re: Bessler Wheel question
My guess would be the weights were disk shaped, perhaps like small versions of the wheel shape. We don't know what they were made of and we don't know their form ie; solid, hollow, etc.