IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[ME]

We need George2!

[agor95]

Well there we have it - this entity that has failed peer-review is advertising the opposite state for personal gain.

It's good I ignored this one.

[silent]

Yeah it's been nothing but a Nigerian scam all along.

[George1]

To ME, agor95 and silent.
-------------------------------
Your clumsy jokes are not able to help you to deny obvious facts. But I can't discuss the matter with you as you all three are simply not experts in theoretical and applied mechanics as eccentrically1 is, for example. Have you read our correspondence with eccentrically1? I doubt that you would understand anything from this discussion even if you have read it. So please do not generate absurd jokes and objections anymore thus demonstrating clearly your ignorance.

[George1]

1) THEORY and PRACTICE! Two words! It is a SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT that if a certain scientific THEORY is correct, then the related PRACTICE has to be also correct. And if you have any objections against this SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT, then you have some mental problems for sure.
2) In overunity.com and in besslerwheel.com/forum we (our team) released ABSOLUTELY FREE two pieces of THEORETICAL research, whose titles are " IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1", respectively. For these two pieces of scientific THEORETICAL research is valid the statement in the previous item 1.
3) These two pieces of scientific THEORETICAL research (mentioned in the above item 2) unambiguously show (no serious and reasonable THEORETICAL objections within a period of two years in overunity.com and in besslerwheel.com/forum) that the law of conservation of energy and the law of coservation of linear momentum are not always correct. But there is nothing special, tragic and disturbing in this fact as any rule/law has its exceptions.
4) Our third piece of technology is a new electric technology which increases many times (at least twice as a minimum) the distance traveled by any standard electric vehicle on a single charge.
5) Our new electric technology has both THEORY and PRACTICE. In other words, we have a WORKING PROTOTYPE which perfectly confirms the correctness of the theoretical concept on which is based the principle of operation of our new electric technology. The latter is practically ready for production on a large industrial scale.
6) The secret of our new electric technology however is NOT FREE. It costs already 40,000,000 (forty) million dollars and this price will further rise if our first two pieces of THEORETICAL research (mentioned in the above item 2) do not win public recognition in the nearest future.
7) These 40,000,000 (forty) million dollars will be used mainly for charity and only a small part of this money will be used for some R&D work.
8) We (our team) are looking for buyers of the secret of our new electric technology (and of our next 7 (seven) inventions and technology innovations).
-------------------
George1

[Robinhood46]

Georg 1,
Your insistence on trying to get others to have the same enthousiasme for your theory is fully understandable. You must try to understand that the expression "you can take a horse to the water but you cannot make it drink" is very appropriate in this situation.
Telling us that this is good water and we should drink it is pointless if we have already decided that we find it a bit cloudy and don't like the smell of it.
Are we right to doubt the pureness of the water is a totally different question, you are free to believe we are wrong.
Sharing our thoughts is very helpfull to many other members. Force feeding them is a pain in the butt.
Many of us, myself included, are pretty good at trying to force feed other members with our thoughts. Some are better than others at it. At present you are the champion of all of us and this why many, like myself, have given you a red star for all your efforts and your determination.
If the water starts pouring uphill all by itself, we will all be happy to accept we were wrong and we will drink it.

[George1]

To Robinhood46.
------------------------------
Thank you for your reply. You are a smart man of good will and tolerance. Thank you again for your post. It will be a great pleasure for me to keep corresponding with you.
George1

[George1]

Hi everyone,
1) "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1" up-to-now discussions unambiguously show that the law of conservation of energy and the law of conservation of linear momentum are not always correct. But there is nothing special, tragic and disturbing in this fact as any rule/law has its exceptions. That's all.
2) We are selling our next 8 (eight) inventions. As a first step we are selling a new electric technology, which increases many times (at least twice as a minimum) the distance traveled by any standard electric vehicle on a single charge. Actually we are selling a WORKING PROTOTYPE together with a full description of its principle of operation.
3) Our new electric technology can be successfully used in any battery-based electric device. For example if our new electric technology is used in an ordinary standard electric torch, then its working hours would be increased many times (at least twice as a minimum) preserving at the same time its standard rated intensity of light. So the electric torch industry could realize a good financial jump by using our new electric technology. (Please note that in many emergency cases the duration and the intensity of an electric torch light are of vital importance for saving of human lives for example.)
4) We have some ideas for how to sell our new electric technology. We are negotiating now with some big companies. At the same time however we are open for collaboration. If some member of this forum suggests a smart method of selling of our new electric technology and/or takes part in the selling process, then he/she would firstly earn good money and secondly, he/she would indirectly contribute to our charity causes.
----------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
George1

[gravitationallychallenged]

@ George1-

6) The secret of our new electric technology however is NOT FREE. It costs already 40,000,000 (forty) million dollars and this price will further rise if our first two pieces of THEORETICAL research (mentioned in the above item 2) do not win public recognition in the nearest future.

So in other words, no one will ever benefit from your technology. You're taunting, denigrating and laughing at your detractors as uneducated, ignorant fools but the joke is on you.

You're repeating Bessler's fatal miscalculation by assuming your technology is desired by the corporate psychopaths who are the only people who have the wealth to afford your price tag. Do you own some 'charities' you're going to donate your millions to and then pay yourself a salary of hundreds of thousands per year to administer the funds? The government patent offices already possess free energy technologies they've shut down because of 'national security' issues. They'll probably steal your technology and shelve it like they've done thousands of times in the past and never let humanity benefit from it.

Matthew 16:26-
For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?

[George1]

To gravitationallychallenged
------------------------------------
Thank you for your post. Please give me some time to consider it carefully.

[George1]

Any buyer of our new electric technology? Any good idea for a successful selling of our new electric technology? (As mentioned in our previous post we are negotiating now with some big companies, but any help/any good idea is welcome.)

[Wubbly]

The government patent offices already possess free energy technologies they've shut down because of 'national security' issues. They'll probably steal your technology and shelve it like they've done thousands of times in the past and never let humanity benefit from it.

This is well known. You can't patent a free energy device.

Here's a 3 minute video of Greer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TV1GossSiM

[George1]

Hi Wubbly and thank you for your post.
Hi everyone,
-----------------------------------------
1) 40,000,000 (forty) million dollars! This is the price (for the present!) of our new electric technology that increases twice (as a minimum) the distance traveled by any standard electric vehicle on a single charge. Actually this new electric technology is our third piece of overunity conception (that is, let's say, 1W at the inlet, 2W at the outlet and efficiency = 2, respectively; the same for 1kW/2kW, 10kW/20kW, etc.), but this time it is experimentally proved. There is a working prototype which can be dullicated/copied as many times as you want (in several variations), if you are familiar with the related basic principle of operation.
-----------------------------------------
2) 1,000,000 (one) million dollars prize will be awarded to that member of this forum who can create a method for a successful selling of our third piece of overunity technology, mentioned in previous item 1.
(Note. Big companies seem to be heavy bureaucratic machines, which work in a very slow manner. Besides big companies' officers of different ranks as if tend to avoid taking responsibilities of any kind. Many of these officers (mainly in US) demonstrate total lack of business and/or technology competence. Furthermore our first two pieces of technology ("IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1") have not won public recognition yet and because of this they are still not famous enough and they are still of no interest to the general public. So as a final result the mentioned-in-our-previous-posts negotiations have been dragging on a little.
-----------------------------------------
3) 1,000,000 (one) million dollars prize will be awarded to that member of this forum who can create a method, which is able to win QUICKLY public recognition for the concepts, described in "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and in "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1". (If the concepts, described in "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and in "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1", win public recognition, then the negotiations, mentioned in the above 'Note', would accelerate substantially for sure.
-----------------------------------------
4) It is evident that 2,000,000 (two) million dollars prize will be awarded to that member of this forum who can create simultaneously the two methods, described in previous items 2 and 3.
-----------------------------------------
So rack your brains and earn some good money, and invest it in your own OU projects. (I am sure that most members of this forum have OU (and other non-standard) projects of their own.)

[George1]

1,000,000 (one) million dollars prize will be awarded to that member of this forum who can create a method, which is able to win QUICKLY public recognition for the concepts, described in "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and in "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1".

[gravitationallychallenged]

@ Gearge1

If you post you concepts on this forum, build units for sale on a one to one basis and open source the technology so members of this forum can start building your devices to sell, you will gain public recognition although not as quickly as you would like.

You refuse to acknowledge that you are not going to become wealthy through any device that threatens the monopoly of the current energy system. If you belonged to the elite organizations who are conquering this planet, you wouldn't waste your time posting on this forum.

The current world system is being destroyed in order to bring in the new system which will be controlled by global corporations, a global banking system, a global health system and a global government. There are millions of desperate people starving to death around the world as a result of the current lockdowns and it's only going to get worse.

It's your choice. You can either give humanity the chance to benefit from your ideas or take them with you to your grave. At least Bessler gave us many clues to ponder. You've given us nothing.