Please help me with a simulation! THIS IS THE PRIME MOVER!!
Moderator: scott
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 11:14 pm
re: Please help me with a simulation! THIS IS THE PRIME MOVE
Ok, so i figure out what C, D, E and that thing below them is (rotating weights) finally...They are what i'm showing in my videos and this is how they work and why the big wheel works.
Many noticed that D is swirling, that is because it's upside down. It conveys the fact that while 1 pair goes to the center the other one goes toward the rim. They always act in pairs, 2 pairs!!!
Some energy is stored into the weights and the weights, by spinning, they generate this linear force. The weights are balanced and they cancel the gravitational effect on each other without wasting any energy to fight gravity (in a perfect situation).
The loss of energy is due to friction mostly, not that much to gravity like in any other model.
MASS IS KEY HERE!!!!!!!!!!!
(1 kg = 2.2 pounds )
Think about this, it's almost the same amount of energy that it's required to spin 1kg weights in this system as 10kg weights or more. The difference is generated by the pressure of the weights on the bearings resulting into friction!
BUT THE OUTPUT IS NOT RELATED TO THE INPUT!
10kg of mass will generate way more linear force then 1kg
Bessler wanted to present this concept by using that Roberval balance at the end! look it up, among the last MT drawings. The concept of having pairs of weights that cancel their fall (gravity)
I still don't understand what A and B are and their relation into the bigger picture obviously....
More research needs to be conducted into this. Also as i mentioned in the post above, it's also possible that we have a whipping action of some sorts. More research needs to go into this as well!
More to come!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Many noticed that D is swirling, that is because it's upside down. It conveys the fact that while 1 pair goes to the center the other one goes toward the rim. They always act in pairs, 2 pairs!!!
Some energy is stored into the weights and the weights, by spinning, they generate this linear force. The weights are balanced and they cancel the gravitational effect on each other without wasting any energy to fight gravity (in a perfect situation).
The loss of energy is due to friction mostly, not that much to gravity like in any other model.
MASS IS KEY HERE!!!!!!!!!!!
(1 kg = 2.2 pounds )
Think about this, it's almost the same amount of energy that it's required to spin 1kg weights in this system as 10kg weights or more. The difference is generated by the pressure of the weights on the bearings resulting into friction!
BUT THE OUTPUT IS NOT RELATED TO THE INPUT!
10kg of mass will generate way more linear force then 1kg
Bessler wanted to present this concept by using that Roberval balance at the end! look it up, among the last MT drawings. The concept of having pairs of weights that cancel their fall (gravity)
I still don't understand what A and B are and their relation into the bigger picture obviously....
More research needs to be conducted into this. Also as i mentioned in the post above, it's also possible that we have a whipping action of some sorts. More research needs to go into this as well!
More to come!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 11:14 pm
re: Please help me with a simulation! THIS IS THE PRIME MOVE
LADYS AND GENTS
HERE IT IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7ahWePBx10
A FEW MORE THINGS TO DO!
I need to change the linkages to get a lower resonant frequency, i changed it from the first i've showed you, this one has a higher resonance, it needs to be inside 30-50rpm, right now is to high and gravity cannot catch up....
also need to figure out a way that when it falls the rotating weights will get excited
and a few more things.....
DO YOU BELIEVE IT ?????????????????????????????????????????????????
WHAT DO YOU THINK ???????????
HERE IT IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7ahWePBx10
A FEW MORE THINGS TO DO!
I need to change the linkages to get a lower resonant frequency, i changed it from the first i've showed you, this one has a higher resonance, it needs to be inside 30-50rpm, right now is to high and gravity cannot catch up....
also need to figure out a way that when it falls the rotating weights will get excited
and a few more things.....
DO YOU BELIEVE IT ?????????????????????????????????????????????????
WHAT DO YOU THINK ???????????
re: Please help me with a simulation! THIS IS THE PRIME MOVE
[quote="TheVisitorV!]DO YOU BELIEVE IT ?... [/quote]
Err .... No.
But I do admire your enthusiasm and typing capacity.
energy is coming from, and how.
For example, is it
Newtonian gravity (NG),
centrifugal force substitute gravity (EG),
or something else?
Err .... No.
But I do admire your enthusiasm and typing capacity.
Since you ask, I think you have to explain where theWHAT DO YOU THINK ?
energy is coming from, and how.
For example, is it
Newtonian gravity (NG),
centrifugal force substitute gravity (EG),
or something else?
AVE MARIA, gratia plena, Dominus tecum.
Ô Marie, conçue sans péché, priez pour nous qui avons recours à vous.
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 11:14 pm
Hey Senax,
I believe both are required, there is an exchange between those 2, the NG starts and keeps EG and the EG raises the weights.
I'm still trying to figure out how and when this exchange happens but i believe i found the framework where this happens. It's a bit hard since i can't simulate properly any belts and they are a must, but... we are getting there...closer and closer...
I believe both are required, there is an exchange between those 2, the NG starts and keeps EG and the EG raises the weights.
I'm still trying to figure out how and when this exchange happens but i believe i found the framework where this happens. It's a bit hard since i can't simulate properly any belts and they are a must, but... we are getting there...closer and closer...
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 11:14 pm
Good luck, W3 (that's where I went to school for 9 years. Just south ofTheVisitorV wrote:Hey Senax,
I believe both are required, there is an exchange between those 2, the NG starts and keeps EG and the EG raises the weights.
I'm still trying to figure out how and when this exchange happens but i believe i found the framework where this happens. It's a bit hard since i can't simulate properly any belts and they are a must, but... we are getting there...closer and closer...
Gunnersbury Park).
AVE MARIA, gratia plena, Dominus tecum.
Ô Marie, conçue sans péché, priez pour nous qui avons recours à vous.
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 11:14 pm
i figured it out, i was right about the framework, but it needs to be used a bit differently, i know why he used the springs as well. he also had a trigger mechanism...
i know how to do it with an electric motor, i'm still confused how he managed to spin the weights while everything else was rotating...lol...tricky bastard...
I will build a "full" model (3d) and show it to you all. it will be ready in a few days. It's completely doable, the machine is not very difficult to build but not that easy.
The principle is the one i showed above, the weights have to spin! and because they do spin, when released by the trigger, and with the stored energy from the springs, by "hammering", they can change position with ease. The weights need to be used as i showed previously to keep the balance between them so they can spin without getting countered by the gravity.
anyway, i'll be ready in 2 days or so...full model with explanation but designed to be powered by electric motor until i figure out how he made everything spin while everything else spins.
one big step forward...a few more to go...
i know how to do it with an electric motor, i'm still confused how he managed to spin the weights while everything else was rotating...lol...tricky bastard...
I will build a "full" model (3d) and show it to you all. it will be ready in a few days. It's completely doable, the machine is not very difficult to build but not that easy.
The principle is the one i showed above, the weights have to spin! and because they do spin, when released by the trigger, and with the stored energy from the springs, by "hammering", they can change position with ease. The weights need to be used as i showed previously to keep the balance between them so they can spin without getting countered by the gravity.
anyway, i'll be ready in 2 days or so...full model with explanation but designed to be powered by electric motor until i figure out how he made everything spin while everything else spins.
one big step forward...a few more to go...
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 11:14 pm
i'm so happy, i found the 1 way wheel !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
it all makes sense now.....everything...eeveeeeryyytttthhhiiiinnnngggggggg
fairly easy to build but there is a certain degree of complexity to it........in the mechanical version the springs are a must....
the hammering its all about loading up the energy between 2 ockock and 4 also mirroring must happen
the loud noise people were hearing was the ratchet releasing the springs,
yes a ratchet is required!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
it's easier then i thought,
it has nothing to do with raising weights or anything like that....the primemover is all you need if you use a fixed axle...i mean it has nothing to do with raising weights the way most of us were trying......
1-1=0
took me a long time to accept that.....
i'm working on it now
for the first time everything makes sense, there are no tricks no violations of any law...
this is not a perpetual motion machine,
it's a field tapping machine, it's converting gravity into mechanical energy....something people believe to be impossible!!!!!!!!!!!!
LOOOOOLLL
Indeed bessler never described the movement, but i did in this post, over and over and over again....all of you who are trying to make bessler wheel and you are not using a small variation of what i showed you to be the prime mover ...your just simply wasting time.
FLETCHER may GOD bless your soul for eternity cause i was blind and you opened my eyes!!!!!!!!!!!!
can't hold my joy inside!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i must stop and get back to work!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
it all makes sense now.....everything...eeveeeeryyytttthhhiiiinnnngggggggg
fairly easy to build but there is a certain degree of complexity to it........in the mechanical version the springs are a must....
the hammering its all about loading up the energy between 2 ockock and 4 also mirroring must happen
the loud noise people were hearing was the ratchet releasing the springs,
yes a ratchet is required!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
it's easier then i thought,
it has nothing to do with raising weights or anything like that....the primemover is all you need if you use a fixed axle...i mean it has nothing to do with raising weights the way most of us were trying......
1-1=0
took me a long time to accept that.....
i'm working on it now
for the first time everything makes sense, there are no tricks no violations of any law...
this is not a perpetual motion machine,
it's a field tapping machine, it's converting gravity into mechanical energy....something people believe to be impossible!!!!!!!!!!!!
LOOOOOLLL
Indeed bessler never described the movement, but i did in this post, over and over and over again....all of you who are trying to make bessler wheel and you are not using a small variation of what i showed you to be the prime mover ...your just simply wasting time.
FLETCHER may GOD bless your soul for eternity cause i was blind and you opened my eyes!!!!!!!!!!!!
can't hold my joy inside!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i must stop and get back to work!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 12:22 pm
- Location: Speyer, Germany
- Contact:
re: Please help me with a simulation! THIS IS THE PRIME MOVE
yes, it is a gravity converter, but you found one way from many.
springs are not necessary, but can be helpful in the one directional wheel,
because you set the system under stress by gravity from begining.
Also a ratchet function must not be included, eccentric weights can do the same function.
springs are not necessary, but can be helpful in the one directional wheel,
because you set the system under stress by gravity from begining.
Also a ratchet function must not be included, eccentric weights can do the same function.
Best regards
Georg
Georg
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 11:14 pm
you know what Georg, you are a continuous source of inspiration for me, thank you, i really mean it!
anyway, i'm making the 2 way machine now, well not that 2 way machine cause i don't have to hide anything, just a simpler version, but this one has springs 2, why not....it's easier!
i will release everything very soon...!!!!!!!
anyway, i'm making the 2 way machine now, well not that 2 way machine cause i don't have to hide anything, just a simpler version, but this one has springs 2, why not....it's easier!
i will release everything very soon...!!!!!!!
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 11:14 pm
The inertial mass fieldTheVisitorV wrote: it's a field tapping machine,
It's converting the reciprocal of 2nd order inertial mass (EG) into mechanical energy.it's converting gravity into mechanical energy....
And they are right in relation to NG.something people believe to be impossible!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ride carefully.Indeed Bessler never described the movement, but I did in this post, over and over and over again....all of you who are trying to make Bessler wheel and you are not using a small variation of what I showed you to be the prime mover ...you're just simply wasting time.
FLETCHER may GOD bless your soul for eternity cause I was blind and you opened my eyes!!!!!!!!!!!!
can't hold my joy inside!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I must stop and get back to work!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AVE MARIA, gratia plena, Dominus tecum.
Ô Marie, conçue sans péché, priez pour nous qui avons recours à vous.
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 11:14 pm
Ride carefully.
what does that mean?
i am careful but not paranoid...
i'm working on a second model, not because the first doesn't work or won't work would be more appropriate, i am doing it just to show another one of his wheels
i thought i found the bidirectional, i didin't yet, but i found where he started to develop it, indeeed, this is a it challenging.
what does that mean?
i am careful but not paranoid...
i'm working on a second model, not because the first doesn't work or won't work would be more appropriate, i am doing it just to show another one of his wheels
i thought i found the bidirectional, i didin't yet, but i found where he started to develop it, indeeed, this is a it challenging.