www.gravitywheel.com has been updated

A Bessler, gravity, free-energy free-for-all. Registered users can upload files, conduct polls, and more...

Moderator: scott

Post Reply
User avatar
John Collins
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3299
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 6:33 am
Location: Warwickshire. England
Contact:

re: www.gravitywheel.com has been updated

Post by John Collins »

I'm curious to know if anyone thinks there is any potential in designing a system which complies with the idea of parametric oscillation? I am sure that that a swing has the potential to provide rotation, just lookat the kiiking people - it looks so simple.

JC
Read my blog at http://johncollinsnews.blogspot.com/

This is the link to Amy’s TikTok page - over 20 million views for one video! Look up amyepohl on google

See my blog at http://www.gravitywheel.com
justsomeone
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2094
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:21 pm

re: www.gravitywheel.com has been updated

Post by justsomeone »

John, You said Bessler was adamant that 5 mech. was used.

You can not say this as fact.

Maybe he liked 5 cups of coffee in the morning.
User avatar
DrWhat
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2040
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:41 pm

Post by DrWhat »

Thanks John, it is the small gradual corrections and clarifications that may lead us to the solution.
justsomeone
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2094
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:21 pm

re: www.gravitywheel.com has been updated

Post by justsomeone »

John, did you spin your wheel, with only one mech. attached, to about 30 to 40 rpms. to see if CF would lock up the long lever?
User avatar
rocky
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:55 pm
Location: Anaheim (Disneyland) California

re: www.gravitywheel.com has been updated

Post by rocky »

I see merit John in ALL that you do. Thank you for sharing your idea of Bessler’s secret wheel design. There are many of us who have shared your quest for years. I sincerely believe that Bessler’s secret will be rediscovered and his name cleared in history thanks to you. And there will be a bronze statue of Bessler to honor him in Germany and another statue of you John in your hometown to honor your lifetime of effort in solving the mystery. And I’ll head the fund Scott for a statue of you in Colorado for hosting this forum. :-)

The bob suspended from a pivot looks like the unnumbered drawing (MT 142) on the back of MT 135 page.

I will be breaking out my lead fishing weights and Meccano set and physically testing your ideas John.

One thing I always ask myself before starting a physical machine is:

Will the mechanics perform at the high centrifugal force that Bessler’s Drashwitz machine had running at 50+ rpm?

I see this as a problem in your described design John.
Will the Shifter and Primary levers be able to work at that speed?
Did you do any test mechanisms and manual run the wheel at 40 -50 rpm do check the movement?

For you fellows that run the simulation, what speed do you rotate wheel? Does the software include CF math on the objects?

John, you must have been up late posting it since there are many spelling and grammer errors. Hope you can correct it.

Thanks again for sharing your notes.
-Rocky
User avatar
John Collins
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3299
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 6:33 am
Location: Warwickshire. England
Contact:

re: www.gravitywheel.com has been updated

Post by John Collins »

Wow - thank you Rocky, I hope it all turns out as you describe! :-)

I'll work on the spelling mistakes, Rocky I thought I'd caught most of them!

Don't forget,justsomeone, that the Merseberg wheel drawing can be shown to have pentagram concealed in it. I do not know of any reason why he would have done that unless it was show that the wheel was divided into five compartments.

Also the Apologia wheel can also be shown to have pentagram hidden in it and there are also similar geometric arrangements elsewhere.

It seems to me that looking for another reason for including and hiding pentagrams in his drawings other than to tell us that there were five mechanisms in his wheel is to look for a less likely reason than the one I have suggested. Some people have suggested more esoteric reasons for their presence but in my opinion we can apply occams razor to this feature and find the most obvious reason.

But I could be wrong.

JC
Read my blog at http://johncollinsnews.blogspot.com/

This is the link to Amy’s TikTok page - over 20 million views for one video! Look up amyepohl on google

See my blog at http://www.gravitywheel.com
User avatar
John Collins
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3299
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 6:33 am
Location: Warwickshire. England
Contact:

re: www.gravitywheel.com has been updated

Post by John Collins »

In response to criticisms of my web site at gravitywheel.com, I have re-arranged the frames and the buttons and posted it at www.orffyreus.org

I don't know if it is any better but perhaps some of you will tell me ;-)

JC
Read my blog at http://johncollinsnews.blogspot.com/

This is the link to Amy’s TikTok page - over 20 million views for one video! Look up amyepohl on google

See my blog at http://www.gravitywheel.com
jonnynet
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 347
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Leipzig, Saxony, Germany

re: www.gravitywheel.com has been updated

Post by jonnynet »

John Collins wrote:...But it starts late and is too slow to provide the quick lift required. On my prototype it finished lifting the primary weight after the nine o'clock point.
I fear this is simply because of the fact that the shifter weight can apply its full force not until this position. Remember what I said about the 90 degree angle. My suggestion is to have the shifter weight at 9'o clock while the connected primary weight is at 6'o clock, like my drawing shows. This will solve the problem of speed but also will not make any wheel turn. In this case both weights are moving the same distance. To build a wheel like this you have to use several layers to place the rods, or you use 2 mechanisms only ;-)
Attachments
Effective way to shift
Effective way to shift
erick
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 402
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:43 pm
Location: New York

Re: re: www.gravitywheel.com has been updated

Post by erick »

John Collins wrote:Wow - thank you Rocky, I hope it all turns out as you describe! :-)

I'll work on the spelling mistakes, Rocky I thought I'd caught most of them!

Don't forget,justsomeone, that the Merseberg wheel drawing can be shown to have pentagram concealed in it. I do not know of any reason why he would have done that unless it was show that the wheel was divided into five compartments.

Also the Apologia wheel can also be shown to have pentagram hidden in it and there are also similar geometric arrangements elsewhere.

It seems to me that looking for another reason for including and hiding pentagrams in his drawings other than to tell us that there were five mechanisms in his wheel is to look for a less likely reason than the one I have suggested. Some people have suggested more esoteric reasons for their presence but in my opinion we can apply occams razor to this feature and find the most obvious reason.

But I could be wrong.

JC
<OR> It's just a coincidence. <OR> You're seeing what you want to see.

I mean no disrespect John, your contributions to our collective cause have been invaluable but your assessment that there are pentagrams in certain diagrams of Bessler's wheels has always seemed somewhat contrived...

E
User avatar
John Collins
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3299
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 6:33 am
Location: Warwickshire. England
Contact:

re: www.gravitywheel.com has been updated

Post by John Collins »

Yes that's OK Eric, it is kind of subjective, but how can anyone actually prove they were put there deliberately without the author's input? And the answer is they can't. However I am satisfied that they are there deliberately and whether you accept that or not is entirely your choice, and I have no problem with that.

JC
Read my blog at http://johncollinsnews.blogspot.com/

This is the link to Amy’s TikTok page - over 20 million views for one video! Look up amyepohl on google

See my blog at http://www.gravitywheel.com
broli
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 706
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 10:09 am

re: www.gravitywheel.com has been updated

Post by broli »

Here's an attempt of animating the mechanism you mention.

Image
User avatar
LustInBlack
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1964
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:30 am

re: www.gravitywheel.com has been updated

Post by LustInBlack »

John, may I suggest you use my artificial horizon mechanism to accomplish your shifting ?!

It's very very simple and it works pretty well (in sim tho) ..

The only difference between your design and mine, was that I was seeking overbalance instead of pumping, but my design does the pumping pretty well..

Look in my personal forum, everything is there in the thread (my idea of the prime mover) .. It's a simple weight-offset wheel in the main wheel, but many of them linked together will seek the horizon all the time, while actuating an external mechanism..

This could actuate your jumping weight, or use as a supplement of energy for your mechanism ..
User avatar
LustInBlack
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1964
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:30 am

re: www.gravitywheel.com has been updated

Post by LustInBlack »

I'm designing a new simulation tonight where the longer arm will shift exactly in the center of the wheel, minimizing negative torque...
Reticon
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 275
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:03 am
Location: Earth

Post by Reticon »

wow, thanks broli! Still haven't had time to read through, but an animation is worth a million words. John, how does that compare to your vision? the animation certainly sparks the imagination. Let's hope John's design can spark some reality too. I'm fond of several aspects of this despite my skepticism.
beapilot
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:58 pm
Location: PA

re: www.gravitywheel.com has been updated

Post by beapilot »

John,

Thank you for posting. Please provide a side by side still image of your weights moving. The images provided move and makes comparison hard. I would like to measure and test line the images to get a better answer.

Thanks,
Joshua
Post Reply