Posted by gill simo (193.195.0.102) on March 07, 2003 at 06:46:58:
In Reply to: Re: excess weight posted by Jeff Langworthy on March 04, 2003 at 05:50:07:
hi again all
ive now asked twice over if anyone has any new idea as 2 what bessler meant by excess weight.thus far only one person jeff has come up with an idea,a THEORY . several others continue to argue the PRINCIPLE that we all know and have known since forever.
now bessler in saying MY THEORY could never ever have been refering to that PRINCIPLE not unless he was quite mad and entirely unaware of that known principle.surely the only madness here is some, many, people pawing over his every breath and then refusing to listen to him.
MY THEORY is a hint, a clue , its bessler saying "listen folks it DOESNT work by any known principle, it works to something new,something that i can only offer a THEORY for". its bessler saying "maybe like this but definately NOT like that.
jeff God bless him is on besslers case and good luck 2 him. he, in imagining ex weight along an axle, is saying MAYBE this and he is ignoring the definately NOT that.
i must still insist that bessler gives it to us STRAIGHT the only problem being that its straight , but at a tangent to our idea of straight. So look at it from our straight angle and with respect your p*****ing in the wind. It has to be looked at from this other angle.we need to imagine something that seems like SURELY NOT from the start and investigate it until its SURELY SO
not look endlessly over thousands of years at surely so and insist forever that its surely not.so again apart from jeff has anyone else got any new nonsense to offer?
all the best GILL