Posted by benson (217.44.20.76) on April 20, 2003 at 06:57:15:
In Reply to: Re: cold fusion simplified posted by Sean Sullivan on August 21, 2002 at 00:36:50:
: Please ignore that last post - I must have accidentaly clicked on the 'Submit Follow Up' button before typing anything.
: For those of you are not aware of it already, Cold Fuson is for real.
: The scientific community and its "defenders of the faith" are now ignoring at least 600 successful transmutation experiments at low spatial energy, in many laboratories and in several nations of the world, by solid scientists.
:
: Just because Cold Fusion is not in the normal particle physics lexicon does not mean it is fiction; the experiments certify that it is real. If our own scientific community were practicing scientific method, it would now be pouring research funding into cold fusion, so that it could explore the phenomenology in order to understand and model it. However, this is sadly not the case.
:
: The photon is comprised of two components: (1) a spatial energy component, and (2) a time component. Time is actually spatial EM energy compressed by the factor c-squared, hence it has essentially the same energy density as mass. Since the spatial energy and time-as-energy components of the photon are canonical, then when one lowers the spatial energy component, one correspondingly increases the time-energy component. To put the time component in spatial energy units, the increase in time-energy must be multiplied by c-squared. So halving the photon's spatial energy component (halving its frequency) multiplies the spatial energy in the time area by 1.8 x 10exp(16).
: In short, the highest energy physics, (given that we transduce time energy into spatial energy) is in the lowest frequency photons.
: Therefore it is little wonder that nuclear transmutations are fairly readily accomplished at low spatial energy, since that involves the highest energy physics of all.
: Best Wishes, Sean.