Posted by murilo (200.168.8.167) on May 28, 2003 at 12:54:15:
In Reply to: Re: to Bessler's croud posted by Darren on May 28, 2003 at 11:45:50:
Darren, one thing is very clear for the while: you didn't understand to Bessler's draws so as to my concepts. They may be familiar, but they are VERY different ideas and deal VERY different basic mechanical components and principles.Thanks for your help and good will, anyway. Murilo
: : Hello. Pls try to understand me. Let's make a temptative for to join some stuffs. At a few weeks, Darren wrote a msg teeling me about some ''familiarity'' between my ''avalanchedrive'' and the draws 49 and 50, and I think he's a bit right
:
: I was surprised at how close it looked.
:
: : besides he wanted to mean that I copy to them, what is his ABSOLUTELY mistake.
:
: No, you misunderstood, I wasn't saying that you copied it, I was trying to show you that your avalanche drive has been tried before, hundreds of years ago, and it doesn't work. Your idea is not a new one, it's already been shown to be unworkable. You can add springs and monkey with it all day long but you are stil trying to raise more than you're dropping... that won't work. I was just trying to help. I know you don't like it when anyone says your avalanche drive won't work, but... this illustration in MT is just more proof of that.
: I don't mean to be negative, but if we are going to be serious about this and honestly work towards a real solution we can't be blind any the errors we make.
: Darren