Posted by Vector Viper (205.162.15.2) on January 09, 2003 at 23:47:51:
In Reply to: Question for Georg Kunstler posted by Davis Landstrom on January 09, 2003 at 17:29:16:
: Georg, I saw in your post entitled 'patent a gravity converter' that you claim to have a working overunity device whose opperation depends on the action of centripedal/fugal force.
: My question is if you start the device spining on a table top, will it continue to spin unaided by human intervention for ever?
: Is that what you mean by a working model?
: If so there realy is no need to get the input/output overunity verified by an indapendant body (university) because the excess output should be sufficient to keep the mechanism going, it would be obviously overunity to any one looking at it.
That's one thing I love about PM wheels/Gravity motors, etc...
Once it's running, there is no doubt...if the machine can lift itself into the air (not nessarily flying, perhaps winding
up a rope or something) it's PM. period. The only question is,
how much OU is it,the power to weight ratio...
: If this is the case then it would be far more productive of you to take the device to both James Randi and Eric Klieg both of whome will give you copious amounts of money for showing that overunity is real and will help you to market your device.
Does OU count? I quote:
"At JREF, we offer a one-million-dollar prize to anyone who can show, under proper observing conditions, evidence of any paranormal, supernatural, or occult power or event."
Is OU supernatural/paranormal? It's certainly not Occult! :*)
Does Eric Klieg have a web site?
Vector Viper