Posted by Georg Kuenstler (217.2.165.95) on January 21, 2003 at 04:25:10:
In Reply to: Question for Mr.Kunstler posted by Davis Landstrom on January 20, 2003 at 18:12:57:
: Judging from your posts in response to numerous questions posed by the group I gather then that you have a device that rotates for ever at high r.p.ms (hence the need for the restraining vice when you photographed it for your site) once started, that derives it's motive power from the centripital inertial derivative force (centrifugal) of the movements of its weights.
: My questions;
: 1. When do you expect to get a patent for your device? -Will you share it with us then?
: 2. If you fail to get a patent for your device (which is a distinct possability as most patenting authorities today will not even consider a perpetual motion device like yours or any mechanism that violates any 'established' physical laws), will you still share it with us?
: I personaly think it is a shame that you are so secretive about it and want to spend time applying for patents when the machine could be out in the public doing good to humanity for free (like Tim Burnus Lee giving us the internet), however to be totaly honest if I were in your possition, or if I ever stumble upon a perpetual energy source any time soon, I'd probably be just as secretive!
Hello Davis,
I have passed the patent to the Patent-office at 10.10.2002.
I hope to get it back soon. I don't think that patent-office can
refuse to give the patent because it is nearby the Patent of the
'Drehmomnetspeicher' which i actually hold.
The new invention is described as a clutch, not as an overunity machine.
If I get a patent or not, I will share this invention with all.
To get a patent has only the sense to block great companies.
If a great company has this patent it will be hidden until we run
out of oil, and then make big money with this invention.
This invention is for all , but not for big energy companies.
The Bessler-solution is easiest to build.
That is my opinion.
Regards Georg