Posted by Georg Kuenstler (217.2.164.12) on January 23, 2003 at 02:49:51:
In Reply to: Clarification of Georg Kuenstler's Claims posted by Scott Ellis on January 22, 2003 at 23:00:22:
: As you all know, Georg Kuenstler has been creating quite a bit of buzz around here lately. Unfortunately, I think the language barrier and other factors might have contributed to some confusion on the matter. I would like to try to help clarify the situation by summarizing my understanding, as best I can.
: Georg, I hope you'll take this opportunity to help set the record straight, and respond to any part of my description that is inaccurate...
: 1. Your "working" device is driven by a drill press, and is designed to exploit an overunity principle involving "centrifugal" force.
: 2. You have measured the device to be overunity, and are employing the services of a local university to confirm the measurement some time this month.
: 3. You believe that Bessler's wheel might have been driven by a by-product of the same overunity principle found in your "working" device.
: 4. You do not have an actual "self-running," classical perpetual motion machine, which moves by itself under the force of gravity alone. You do have plans for such a machine under patent review, however.
:
: I genuinely hope that my statements are correct, and that they help to clear up any lingering misunderstandings.
: Best,
: Scott
Hi Scott,
Yes, all your 4 statements are correct.
Regards Gerog