Posted by grim (206.162.192.40) on July 03, 2003 at 22:24:35:
In Reply to: More information posted by Michael on July 03, 2003 at 17:45:43:
: Hi everyone. I know I haven't written on here a lot, some under a pseudo..., Jason. I hope John as well as Darren and anyone else who knows me will attest to the fact perpetual motion is something I've worked on for quite a while now. I first contacted John close to six years ago. The current machine I am building I've designed a few months ago, and I am actually kicking myself right now because as I have mentioned to another person I had the main principles right before me about three years ago. To quote John, I glossed right over it. Actually it was because I was VERY frustrated at spending so many hours and money researching what I thought would work, only to have it fail. It seemed like I was in a quagmire of endless research, all the while this was calling out to me, look here, look here. I almost shed tears at writting this, I pray I haven't missed my window of opportunity. There are actually two individuals who have forced me (not directly) to admit I know something, well before my machine is finished. Something...as I said, I did not want to do. One of them I am not so sure of anymore. The other is Matt AKA Grim. I have contacted Grim several times, in hopes of coming to a kind of aimiable working agreement with him. I've received little back but short and curt messages, and finally nothing. It is my perpective Grim fancies himself a bit of a gambler (quoted as saying we'll see when all the cards are on the table) and may want all the credit to himself. Grim, you need to know this is something I've worked towards for quite a while, and did come to this discovery a few months ago. I am still willing to work with you in reveiling and claiming a certain prize together. Darren, please don't feel burned by this. I really feel what you and I have is not the same but am still willing to honour our agreement, as well as help you out if need be. So...what I feel Grim has that is the same as me, without reveiling too many details is, we have both discovered a principle that violates a physics impossibility. Grim got his idea from a certain source ( I know that now) where I came to it on my own. I guess it is irrelevent how we come up with these things ( at least at the moment, as long as what we have is a working machine. Where I feel we may differ, just from what I've been reading, is the construction. Please keep in mind, this is not a brag, Grim, I know mine is Bessler's. I know ALL the clues, because of retrospect. I can only fathom two ways of making this work, and one of the ways fits ALL of the clues. There is no further guess work for either method. To the people I wrote a message to, please write back to me.
: Sigh...well the "scooby doo" mystery is solved. All I am asking for is a little help, honesty, and respect.
: BEST regards,
: Mike Olson
You didn't ask for help, you asked for design details before testing ahead of everyone else. Then you wanted some kind of "deal" with several others involved.
If you've got a design to present to Randi, then go get your million bucks. More power to you. The only question posed to you was how many moving parts; boy, that's
real intrusive. Then you put my name on the board (as if I care).
Got my design from "other sources"? Too many others know better, and can attest to that. I won't even respond to that kind of tripe.
grim