Posted by grim (206.162.192.40) on August 11, 2003 at 13:41:08:
In Reply to: Re: Grim question posted by grim on August 11, 2003 at 13:01:05:
: Just went to a site, FYI, that stated it was against US Federal law to construct a "perpetual motion machine" that would prove detrimental to
: the petroleum industry and utilities. Before I take that at face value, will search US Code.
Appears to be a bunch of bunk. Nothing in US Code other than the PTO would require a model.
grim