Posted by ovyyus (150.101.147.208) on August 27, 2003 at 18:01:58:
In Reply to: Re: Perpetuum mobile !!! posted by Mikhail on August 27, 2003 at 06:16:22:
Hi Mikhail,
Not what I meant, but I can understand why you would see it that way given your own design attempts using fluid boyancy.
What I meant was that when mass is added to the rim of a wheel in order to create a continual overbalancing force, like with a water wheel, the maximum wheel RPM is determined by gravity acceleration velocity 9.8 M/s/s. A mass can only fall/accelerate at 9.8 M/s/s - no faster. This limits the maximum speed of an overbalancing wheel.
Replace the water with, say, steel ball bearings and the result is the same.
The question I would ask is how did Bessler achieve such a high wheel RPM using mass overbalance on it's own? I believe there must have been some form of mass reaction (perhaps derived from the use of springs) in order to get a 9.3 feet diameter wheel (Draschwitz) up to 50 RPM.
Remember Bessler made that odd statement that it is useless to attempt the overbalanced wheel. Why would he say that? Perhaps because an overbalanced wheel could never replicate his fast wheel RPM. Therefore, there must have been more to it than simple overbalance alone. I believe that mass reaction is the answer and that the force of this reaction increased with wheel speed.
Regards, ovyyus
: Hello,
: Seen well.
: They is true that the use of water can solve the problem of regulation speed.
: Regards
: Mikhail.
: