Posted by grim (206.162.192.40) on August 13, 2002 at 14:44:13:
Thanks to Mr. Landstrom for the thorough answer. I have no idea why the instructor would not answer. As far as the universe being only 6,000-10,000 years old, I don't buy that either. On the other hand, the fossil record of the earth jumps from lifeless pre-cambrian rock to cambrian rock that is teeming with relatively complex life forms. Both views apparently have their flaws.
So what are the ramifications of the speed of light slowing down other than our calculations might all be junk? Besides, if you follow the theories of Edwin Schroedinger (the Paradox of Schroedinger's Cat) the guys observing the quasars (which exist in all states until an observer collapses the system into one "reality") they may have collapsed the whole thing into a "reality"
where the speed of light had slowed down. Who knows?
Any more word on the Costa wheel?
Finally got this damn job done I've been tied up with for 3 weeks, can get back to my project.
Regards to all,
Grim